DB2 - Problembeschreibung
Problem IC61909 | Status: Geschlossen |
ENABLE GENERATION OF IMPLIED IN-LIST PREDICATES FOR OR PREDICATE WHEN QUERY ON A SINGLE TABLE. | |
Produkt: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 | |
Problembeschreibung: | |
We are enabling generatiuon of implied IN-list predicates for the OR predicate set when query on a single table. The OR predicate is restricted to have only equal (=) and inlist (IN) predicate subterm therefore only implied IN-list predicate would be generated. With the new IN-list generated, we have new opportunity to carry out IN-TO-JOIN transformation to enhance query performance. e.g. select a1,a2,a3 from a where (a1 = 1 and a3 in ('aa','bb','cc')) or (a1 = 1 and a3 in ('dd','ee')) or (a1 = 2 and a3 in ('ff')); Optimized query: SELECT ALL Q3.A1, Q3.A2, Q3.A3 FROM A Q3 WHERE SYSIBM.SINLIST(Q3.A3, 'aa', 'bb', 'cc', 'dd', 'ee', 'ff') AND SYSIBM.SINLIST(Q3.A1, 1, 2) AND (((Q3.A1 = 1) AND SYSIBM.SINLIST(Q3.A3, 'aa', 'bb', 'cc')) OR ((Q3.A1 = 1) AND SYSIBM.SINLIST(Q3.A3, 'dd', 'ee'))) OR ((Q3.A1 = 2) AND (Q3.A3 = 'ff')); Note that there are existing condition to carry IN-TO-JOIN transfromation, the new IN predicate is expected to comply to those existing condition for have IN-TO-JOIN resulted. | |
Problem-Zusammenfassung: | |
ENABLE GENERATION OF IMPLIED IN-LIST PREDICATES FOR OR PREDICATE WHEN QUERY ON A SINGLE TABLE. | |
Local-Fix: | |
Workaround: You may manually rewritten the query with the implied IN predicate as shown in the example. defect: wsdbu00554342 | |
verfügbare FixPacks: | |
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Lösung | |
Problem was first fixed in Version 9.7 Fix Pack 2 | |
Workaround | |
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix | |
Weitere Daten | |
Datum - Problem gemeldet : Datum - Problem geschlossen : Datum - der letzten Änderung: | 08.07.2009 17.05.2010 17.05.2010 |
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.7.FP2 | |
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version | |
9.7.0.2 |