home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC88650 Status: Closed

Queries with large IN predicates on the same column as an equality join may
perform poorly

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A10 - DB2
Problem description:
A query that contains a large IN predicate applied to the same 
column as an equality join may show a RIDSCAN consuming many 
IXSCAN inputs instead of using a nested loop join to probe the 
index with the key values. For example the following query could 
suffer from this issue when both T1.c1 and T2.c1 have indexes 
defined. 
 
SELECT * 
FROM T1, T2 
WHERE T1.c1 = T2.c1 
  AND T1.c1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, 
        ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, 
?, ?, ?, ?, 
        ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, 
?, ?, ?, ?, 
        ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, 
?, ?, ?, ?, 
        ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) 
 
Upon examination of the access plan you may see a NLJOIN between 
T1 and a GENROW operator followed by a subsequent join to T2 
that is accessed using RIDSCAN with many IXSCAN input plans.
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* ALL                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 2.                      * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Create and apply an optimization profile that forces the IN to 
join plan using the following guideline 
 
<OPTGUIDELINES><INLIST2JOIN/></OPTGUIDELINES>
available fix packs:
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 3a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Solution
First fixed in DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 2.
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
28.11.2012
09.04.2013
09.04.2013
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
10.1.0.2 FixList
10.5.0.2 FixList