home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IT10651 Status: Closed

RDC: PERF: THROUGHPUT VERY LOW (98% DEGRADED) WHEN DIAGLEVEL IS 4

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problem description:
Setting dbm cfg param diaglevel to 4 is expected to have worse 
performance than diaglevel 3, but the performance in v98fp3 
diaglevel 4 resembles that of an nbuild and is very very low. 
 
There is a message that is dumped to db2diag.log very 
frequently: 
 
2010-10-26-15.53.24.315615-240 I3145388E547          LEVEL: Info 
PID     : 25191                TID  : 46916826032448 PROC : 
db2sysc 
INSTANCE: aaa                  NODE : 000          DB   : DTW 
APPHDL  : 0-69                 APPID: *LOCAL.aaa.101026195321 
AUTHID  : AAA 
EDUID   : 80                   EDUNAME: db2agent (AAA) 
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, trace services, sqlt_logerr_data (secondary 
logging function), probe:50 
MESSAGE : DEBUG: javaDebug init 
DATA #1 : Hexdump, 1 bytes 
0x00002AABACBEF1FB : 00 
 
 
I created a gbuild which comments out this line in 
/vbs/engn/sqri/sqlriudf.C : 
 
                sqlt_logerr_data("DEBUG: javaDebug init", 
                                 &fmpParms.javaDebug, 
                                 sizeof(fmpParms.javaDebug), 
                                 SQLT_FFSL_INF); 
 
 
The performance of my gbuild in diaglevel 4 is very close to our 
nightly runs which run at diaglevel 3. So vanilla s101021 had a 
TPS of 27.59 (run number lnx05_7741) as opposed to my gbuild's 
TPS of 2338.2 (run number lnx05_7739) 
 
 
Is this message important to be dumped to db2diag.log or can it 
be logged less frequently or removed altogether?
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* NA                                                           * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Change diaglevel to 3                                        * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Change diaglevel to 3
Solution
NA
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
12.08.2015
05.11.2015
05.11.2015
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.7.0.11 FixList