suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IT34469 Status: Closed

CLIENT GETS -901 DTS MISMATCH BETWEEN REQUEST AND CACHE INSTEAD OF -910

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / B10 - DB2
Problem description:
Intermittent -901 instead of expected -910 are possible when
running ALTER SQL statements and
commits are not done by the application as expected.

In sql where user should commit immediately after the ALTER SQL
statement, if that is not done,
SQL910N  should be returned. However sometimes SQL0901N is
returned and FODC directory is created.
This is wrong.

db2diag.log will have:

FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data management, sqldSeqFetchUpdateGen,
probe:3038
MESSAGE : ZRC=0x82040001=-2113667071=SQLD_NONSEVERE_PRGERR
          "non-severe dms programming error"
          DIA8532C An internal processing error has occurred.
DATA #1 : String, 38 bytes
DTS mismatch between request and cache
DATA #2 : String, 21 bytes
Problem Summary:
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              *
* Users expecting -910 could get -901.                         *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         *
* See Error Description                                        *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              *
* See Error Description                                        *
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Do:
  execute immediate 'alter table   alter column ...
  commit;--

As expected
Solution
Workaround
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              *
* Users expecting -910 could get -901.                         *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         *
* See Error Description                                        *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              *
* See Error Description                                        *
****************************************************************
Comment
See Error Description
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
07.10.2020
19.03.2021
19.03.2021
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)