home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Neueste VersionenFixList
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Haben Sie Probleme? - Kontaktieren Sie uns.
Kostenlos registrieren anmeldung-x26
Kontaktformular kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problembeschreibung

Problem IC62070 Status: Geschlossen

SNAPSHOT INFO REPORTS A VERY HIGH MAXCOORDAGENTS VALUE.

Produkt:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problembeschreibung:
Database snapshot can report a very high value for MaxCoord 
agents in the database snapshot as follows: 
 
              Database Snapshot 
 
Database name                              = XXXX 
Database path = 
/d/ny001idb00/d1/ibmdb2/nytxt370/nytxt370/NODE0001/SQL00002/ 
<snip> 
 
Maximum coordinating agents                = 4294967295 
 
 
In a DPF env following query also reports this behavior. 
 
select dec(DBPARTITIONNUM,3) as DP# ,int(CONNECTIONS_TOP) as 
con_top 
,dec(COORD_AGENTS_TOP,11) ca_top ,int(AGENTS_TOP) as agt_top 
,int(TOTAL_CONS) as tot_con_inst_strt ,int(TOTAL_SEC_CONS) as 
tot_sa_con 
,int(APPLS_CUR_CONS) as active_con ,int(APPLS_IN_DB2) as 
active_ca 
,int(NUM_ASSOC_AGENTS) as #_sa FROM SYSIBMADM.SNAPDB order by 1 
 
DP# CON_TOP CA_TOP AGT_TOP TOT_CON_INST_STRT TOT_SA_CON 
ACTIVE_CON 
ACTIVE_CA #_SA 
----- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------------- 
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 
1. 300 4294967295. 189 391481 50347 50 5 58 
2. 111 4294967294. 134 327966 316624 21 0 8 
3. 102 4294967295. 99 149553 138207 9 0 8 
4. 91 4294967293. 84 149854 138244 9 0 6 
5. 91 4294967295. 86 149571 138223 9 0 5 
 
  5 record(s) selected. 
 
 
This seem to occur after the database is activated and some 
activity has happened against the db.
Problem-Zusammenfassung:
DATABASE SNAPSHOT INFO REPORTS A VERY HIGH MAXCOORDAGENTS VALUE. 
 
Database snapshot can report a very high value for MaxCoord 
 
agents in the database snapshot as follows: 
 
              Database Snapshot 
 
Database name                              = XXXX 
Database path = 
/d/ny001idb00/d1/ibmdb2/nytxt370/nytxt370/NODE0001/SQL00002/ 
<snip> 
 
Maximum coordinating agents                = 4294967295 
 
 
In a DPF env following query also reports this behavior. 
 
select dec(DBPARTITIONNUM,3) as DP# ,int(CONNECTIONS_TOP) as 
con_top ,dec(COORD_AGENTS_TOP,11) ca_top ,int(AGENTS_TOP) as 
agt_top ,int(TOTAL_CONS) as tot_con_inst_strt 
,int(TOTAL_SEC_CONS) as tot_sa_con ,int(APPLS_CUR_CONS) as 
active_con ,int(APPLS_IN_DB2) as active_ca 
,int(NUM_ASSOC_AGENTS) as #_sa FROM SYSIBMADM.SNAPDB order by 1 
DP# CON_TOP CA_TOP AGT_TOP TOT_CON_INST_STRT TOT_SA_CON 
ACTIVE_CON ACTIVE_CA #_SA 
----- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------------- 
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 
1. 300 4294967295. 189 391481 50347 50 5 58 
2. 111 4294967294. 134 327966 316624 21 0 8 
3. 102 4294967295. 99 149553 138207 9 0 8 
4. 91 4294967293. 84 149854 138244 9 0 6 
5. 91 4294967295. 86 149571 138223 9 0 5 
 
  5 record(s) selected. 
 
This seem to occur after the database is activated and some 
activity has happened against the db.
Local-Fix:
verfügbare FixPacks:
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 1 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 3a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Lösung
First fixed in v9.7 FP1
Workaround
n/a
Weitere Daten
Datum - Problem gemeldet    :
Datum - Problem geschlossen :
Datum - der letzten Änderung:
19.07.2009
04.02.2010
04.02.2010
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos)
9.7.FP1
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version
9.7.0.1 FixList