DB2 - Problembeschreibung
Problem IC63859 | Status: Geschlossen |
DB2 MAY RETURN SQL101N WHEN COMPILING CERTAIN QUERIES WITH AN OUTER JOIN AND A GROUP-BY SUBQUERY. | |
Produkt: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 910 - DB2 | |
Problembeschreibung: | |
DB2 may return SQL101N when compiling queries that satisfy all of the following conditions: 1. Query has LEFT or RIGHT OUTER JOIN subquery, called ojSubq 2. Query has Group-By subquery, called gbSubq 3. gbSubq inner joins with ojSubq. gbSubq join key(s) contain all its Group-By columns. Some ojSubq join key(s) is derived from its own Group-By subquery or Null Producing stream of its own outer join subquery. How to diagnose the issue: 1. The query returns SQL101N even when STMTHEAP has been set to maximum value. Query goes into an infinite loop until the the STMTHEAP is exhausted. 2. The failing trace stack includes the following routines: ..... 0x0900000070E4750C sqlnr_reorder_IJ_qgm__FCP9sqlnq_qunCP9sqlnq_oprPP13sqlnq_deplist PiCP3loc + 0x346C 0x0900000070E18890 sqlnr_qrwprep_phase2__FP3locPi + 0xAB0 ..... 3. db2trc output indicates that sqlnr_qrwpprep_phase2() calls sqlnr_reorder_IJ_qgm() in an infinite loop. This issue occurs only starting 9.5 Fixpak 4 | |
Problem-Zusammenfassung: | |
DB2 MAY RETURN SQL101N WHEN COMPILING CERTAIN QUERIES WITH AN OUTER JOIN AND A GROUP-BY SUBQUERY. | |
Local-Fix: | |
Manually change equality join predicate between gbSubq and ojSubq to a BETWEEN predicate. For example, change WHERE gbSubq.colX = ojSubq.colY to WHERE gbSubq.colX BETWEEN ojSubq.colY AND ojSubq.colY | |
verfügbare FixPacks: | |
DB2 Version 9.1 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX and Windows | |
Lösung | |
Problem was first fixed in Version 9.1 Fixpak 9 | |
Workaround | |
Manually change equality join predicate between gbSubq and ojSubq to a BETWEEN predicate. For example, change WHERE gbSubq.colX = ojSubq.colY to WHERE gbSubq.colX BETWEEN ojSubq.colY AND ojSubq.colY | |
Weitere Daten | |
Datum - Problem gemeldet : Datum - Problem geschlossen : Datum - der letzten Änderung: | 20.10.2009 16.04.2010 16.04.2010 |
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.0., 9.1. | |
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version | |
9.1.0.9 |