DB2 - Problembeschreibung
Problem IC64040 | Status: Geschlossen |
SCALAR UDF RESULT USED IN A PREDICATE MAY RESULT IN INCORRECT CARDINALITY ESTIMATE | |
Produkt: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 | |
Problembeschreibung: | |
When the result of a SCALAR User Defined Function (UDF), scalar sub-select, or subquery with a "FETCH FIRST 1 ROW ONLY" (FF1RO) clause specified, is used in a predicate, the optimizer may incorrectly compute the filter factor, and cardinality that results from applying the predicate. There are two instances that this can occur in: 1) Scalar UDF with begin atomic/end atomic. In this case, due to the way in which the UDF is expanded, and incorporated into the query access plan, the optimizer may estimate that any predicate will filter away the entire data stream. 2) Scalar UDF without begin atomic/end atomic, scalar sub-select, or a subquery with a FF1RO clause. In this case, the optimizer may treat the predicate as a base table join, which may lead to a filter factor that is too small, and lead the optimizer to believe the predicate is more filtering then it really will be. In either of these cases, the low cardinality that results from applying the predicate or predicates can lead the optimizer to generate a suboptimial query access plan. | |
Problem-Zusammenfassung: | |
SCALAR UDF RESULT USED IN A PREDICATE MAY RESULT IN INCORR CARDINALITY ESTIMATE. The defect for that APAR (wsdbu00536316) shows as having shipped in v91fp8. | |
Local-Fix: | |
Workarounds: There are a number of work arounds that may get around this problem: 1) If the UDF uses begin atomic/end atomic, but is only a single query, it is possible to remove the begin atomic/end atomic. This may result in a better query access plan 2) Include the result of the UDF, scalar sub-select, or subquery (if uncorrelated) in a Common Table Expression. For example: Example DDL: create table t1(c1 int, c2 int, c3 int); create table t2(d1 int); create function udf() returns int language sql reads sql data return select d1 from t2 fetch first 1 row only; Example Original Query: select c1, c2, c3 from t1 where c1 = udf(); Example Modified Query: WITH UDF_RESULT(result) AS (VALUES udf()) select c1, c2, c3 from t1, udf_result where c1 = result; 3) If multiple UDFs are used, include multiple results in the Common Table Expression Options 2 and 3 are most likely to be of benefit when there are multiple UDFs, scalar sub-selects or subqueries with a FF1RO clause, or the UDF(s), scalar sub-select(s) or subqueries with a FF1RO clause are used multiple times in the query, and will return the same result for each invocation. | |
verfügbare FixPacks: | |
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 1 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Lösung | |
There are a number of work arounds that may get around this problem: 1) If the UDF uses begin atomic/end atomic, but is only a single query, it is possible to remove the begin atomic/end atomic. This may result in a better query access plan 2) Include the result of the UDF, scalar sub-select, or subquery (if uncorrelated) in a Common Table Expression. For example: Example DDL: create table t1(c1 int, c2 int, c3 int); create table t2(d1 int); create function udf() returns int language sql reads sql data return select d1 from t2 fetch first 1 row only; Example Original Query: select c1, c2, c3 from t1 where c1 = udf(); Example Modified Query: WITH UDF_RESULT(result) AS (VALUES udf()) select c1, c2, c3 from t1, udf_result where c1 = result; 3) If multiple UDFs are used, include multiple results in the Common Table Expression Options 2 and 3 are most likely to be of benefit when there are multiple UDFs, scalar sub-selects or subqueries with a FF1RO clause, or the UDF(s), scalar sub-select(s) or subqueries with a FF1RO clause are used multiple times in the query, and will return the same result for each invocation. | |
Workaround | |
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix | |
Weitere Daten | |
Datum - Problem gemeldet : Datum - Problem geschlossen : Datum - der letzten Änderung: | 22.10.2009 28.12.2009 28.12.2009 |
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos) | |
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version | |
9.7.0.1 |