DB2 - Problembeschreibung
Problem IC64497 | Status: Geschlossen |
Lifting some restrictions on creating MQTs on LBAC protected tables and MQTs on views which depend on LBAC protected tables | |
Produkt: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 910 - DB2 | |
Problembeschreibung: | |
DB2 V9.1 GA to V9.1 FP8 does not allow the creation of MQTs which depend on LBAC protected tables. Starting with DB2 V9.1 FP9, this restriction has been lifted for the creation of MQTs that do not reference protected columns from a base table. Note DB2 will still block the following with SQL20208N reason code 4 : - MQTs that depend on row protected tables - MQTs that depend on column protected tables, if a protected column is used as a predicate anywhere in the hierarchy, or is part of the MQT definition. | |
Problem-Zusammenfassung: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * All LBAC users, which want to create an MQT that depends ona * * protected table. * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * DB2 V9.1 GA to V9.1 FP8 does not allow the creation of * * MQTswhich depend on LBAC protected tables. * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to DB2 V9.1 FP9 * **************************************************************** | |
Local-Fix: | |
verfügbare FixPacks: | |
DB2 Version 9.1 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX and Windows | |
Lösung | |
Starting with DB2 V9.1 FP9, this restriction has been lifted for the creation of MQTs that do not reference protected columns from a base table. Note DB2 will still block the following with SQL20208N reason code 4 : - MQTs that depend on row protected tables - MQTs that depend on column protected tables, if a protected column is used as a predicate anywhere in the hierarchy, or is part of the MQT definition. | |
Workaround | |
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix | |
Weitere Daten | |
Datum - Problem gemeldet : Datum - Problem geschlossen : Datum - der letzten Änderung: | 11.11.2009 15.04.2010 15.04.2010 |
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.1.FP9, 9.1.FP9 | |
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version | |
9.1.0.9 |