DB2 - Problembeschreibung
Problem IC76021 | Status: Geschlossen |
SOME 32-BIT DB2 REGISTRY KEYS ARE NOT SET DURING THE SILENT INSTALL OF 64-BIT IBM DATA SERVER DRIVER PACKAGE (DSDRIVER) | |
Produkt: | |
DB2 CONNECT / DB2CONNCT / 950 - DB2 | |
Problembeschreibung: | |
When the 64-bit IBM Data Server Driver Package (DsDriver) is installed via a response file based silent install, the following 32-bit DB2 registry keys are not set in the 32-bit registry hive (1) DB2 Path Name, under: HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\IBM\DB2\InstalledCopies\<CopyName>\ Some 32-bit DB2 applications need this registry to work with the 32-bit DB2 libraries installed with the 64-bit DB2 product. (2) The OLEDB GUIDs, under: HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\IBM\DB2\InstalledCopies\<CopyName>\Ins tallData\ These OLEDB GUIDs are needed in order to register the DB2 OLE DB providers. Thus, because those 32-bit DB2 registry keys are not set during the silent 64-bit DsDriver install, some 32-bit DB2 applications will not be able to work with the 64-bit DsDriver installed, and the OLE DB provider will not be registered. | |
Problem-Zusammenfassung: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * WINDOWS * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * See Problem Description above. * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * UPGRADE TO DB2 V9.5 FP 9 OR HIGHER * * * * OR * * * * USE TEMPORARY FIX * **************************************************************** | |
Local-Fix: | |
Install the 64-bit DsDriver via a GUI install, instead of the response file based silent install. | |
verfügbare FixPacks: | |
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Lösung | |
FIRST FIXED IN DB2 V9.5 FP 9 | |
Workaround | |
Install the 64-bit DsDriver via a GUI install, instead of the response file based silent install. | |
Weitere Daten | |
Datum - Problem gemeldet : Datum - Problem geschlossen : Datum - der letzten Änderung: | 26.04.2011 08.03.2012 08.03.2012 |
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.5.FP9 | |
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version | |
9.5.0.9 |