DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 980 - DB2

You might encounter incorrect output from a SQL statement that 
references a partitioned table with a multi-column range key, 
and satisfies all the following conditions: 
 
1.  The WHERE clause contains a partition elimination eligible 
predicate, p1, with place holder variable, such as COL1=? 
2.  The WHERE clause contains a correlated subquery or a join, 
p2, that is partition elimination eligible. 
3.  The predicate p1 is applied on a leading column in the range 
key, followed by the predicate p2. 
 
For example, consider a table T1 partitioned by range on 
(COL1,COL2). If an SQL statement contains a WHERE clause as 
 
SELECT ... 
FROM ..., T1, T2, ... 
WHERE ... T1.COL1 = ? AND T1.COL2 = T2.X ... 
 
then, you might encounter incorrect output. Likewise, incorrect 
output is also possible if the predicates are within a 
correlated subquery such as 
 
WHERE T2.Y = (SELECT MAX(T1.Y) FROM T1 WHERE T1.COL1 = ? AND 
T1.COL2 = T2.Y) 
 
If the predicates on COL1 and COL2 are switched, you will get 
the correct output.

**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* ALL                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 Version 9.8 Fix Pack 5                        * 
****************************************************************

Replace the place holder variable with a constant or use the 
REOPT option.

Problem was first fixed in Version 9.8 Fix Pack 5

See LOCAL FIX

Datum - Problem gemeldet    :
Datum - Problem geschlossen :
Datum - der letzten Änderung:

14.05.2012
28.11.2012
28.11.2012

9.8.FP5