home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Neueste VersionenFixList
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Haben Sie Probleme? - Kontaktieren Sie uns.
Kostenlos registrieren anmeldung-x26
Kontaktformular kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problembeschreibung

Problem IC84493 Status: Geschlossen

THE OPTIMIZER MIGHT CHOOSE A SUB-OPTIMAL ACCESS PLAN FOR SQL USI NG RANGE
PREDICATES WITH PLACE HOLDER VARIABLE.

Produkt:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A10 - DB2
Problembeschreibung:
The optimizer might choose a sub-optimal nested loop join 
(NLJOIN) access plan for an SQL statement containing range 
predicates with place holder variables, where the inner input of 
the NLJOIN is an index-anding (IXAND) access of the base table; 
e.g. 
. 
select ... from tab1, tab2 where tab1.COLA=tab2.COLA and 
tab1.COLB >=? and tab1.COLC < ?; 
You can collect an EXPLAIN of the statement to verify the access 
plan chosen by the optimizer shows an NLJOIN with an IXAND over 
a single base table access on the inner (right) input where the 
index scans below the IXAND apply the join and range predicates. 
If the inner input includes a TEMP, and the statement includes 
an IN predicate with place holder variables in the values list 
such as "tab1.COLD IN (?,?,?,?)" then APAR IC73877 is a likely 
candidate. 
. 
You can use the REOPT ONCE/ALWAYS option to solve this issue. 
The sub-optimal access plan can be chosen as a result of errors 
in the cardinality estimate due to the unknown values to be used 
in the range predicates such as tab1.COLB >=? and tab1.COLC < ?.
Problem-Zusammenfassung:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* ALL                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 1                       * 
****************************************************************
Local-Fix:
You can use the REOPT ONCE/ALWAYS option to solve this issue.
verfügbare FixPacks:
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 1 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 3a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Lösung
First fixed in Version 10.1 Fix Pack 1.
Workaround
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix
Weitere Daten
Datum - Problem gemeldet    :
Datum - Problem geschlossen :
Datum - der letzten Änderung:
14.06.2012
31.10.2012
31.10.2012
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos)
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version
10.1.0.1 FixList
10.5.0.1 FixList