home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Neueste VersionenFixList
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Haben Sie Probleme? - Kontaktieren Sie uns.
Kostenlos registrieren anmeldung-x26
Kontaktformular kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problembeschreibung

Problem IC91803 Status: Geschlossen

MEMORY LEAK IN UCA500R1 COLLATION DATABASE WHEN USING COLUMN NAME IN
pattern-expression of LIKE clause

Produkt:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A10 - DB2
Problembeschreibung:
This memory leak is specific to using a UCA500R1 collation 
sequence database in conjunction with a LIKE predicate that uses 
column name in pattern expression. 
Example of the syntax:  LIKE(MyCol || '%'). 
This type of LIKE pattern expression is supported since version 
9.7 Fixpack 4. 
 
You can identify the leak in PRIVATE memory using the db2pd tool 
: 
 
 
DB2SYSC=`db2pd -edu | grep "db2sysc PID:" | awk  '{ print $3}'` 
db2pd -dbptnmem > dbptnmem.1.out 
db2pd -memb pid=$DB2SYSC > memb.1.out 
 
db2 "select * from MySchema.MyTable WHERE COALESCE(MyCol_1,'') 
LIKE (MyCol_2 || '%')" 
 
db2pd -dbptnmem > dbptnmem.2.out 
db2pd -memb pid=$DB2SYSC > memb.2.out 
 
 
After the running the statement, the size of PRIVATE MEMORY will 
show an increase in PRIVATE memory that could be consequent 
depending on the result set (you can compare the 2 output files 
generated as above : dbptnmem.*.out) : 
 
 
=== BEFORE EXECUTION === 
Database Partition Memory Controller Statistics 
 
Controller Automatic: N 
Memory Limit:         4000000 KB 
Current usage:        341376 KB 
HWM usage:            341376 KB 
Cached memory:        175296 KB 
 
Individual Memory Consumers: 
 
Name             Mem Used (KB) HWM Used (KB) Cached (KB) 
======================================================== 
APPL-FOD                160000        160000      158848 
DBMS-dbguest0            48448         48448           0 
FMP_RESOURCES            22528         22528           0 
PRIVATE                   9344          9344           0 
LCL-p21517                 128           128           0 
DB-FOD                  100928        100928       16448 
 
 
 
=== AFTER EXECUTION === 
Database Partition Memory Controller Statistics 
 
Controller Automatic: N 
Memory Limit:         4000000 KB 
Current usage:        2590208 KB 
HWM usage:            2595200 KB 
Cached memory:        175296 KB 
 
Individual Memory Consumers: 
 
Name             Mem Used (KB) HWM Used (KB) Cached (KB) 
======================================================== 
APPL-FOD                160000        160000      158848 
DBMS-dbguest0            48384         48384           0 
FMP_RESOURCES            22528         22528           0 
PRIVATE                2258240       2258240           0 
LCL-p20550                 128           128           0 
DB-FOD                  100928        100928       16448 
 
 
This memory leak can lead to a SEGV in sqlvCCCBuildNextLikeRule 
or sqlnlsStringSearch_open_ICUbug_U500R1 if the leak grows over 
INSTANCE_MEMORY. In such case the trap will show a stack similar 
to this one : 
 
PC location: 
__1cYsqlvCCCBuildNextLikeRule6FpnIsqlrr_cb_pknOsqlrxCollation_pp 
nPsqlvCCCLikeRule_6pCi8iipi_i_ + 0x11a8 
Object file: /opt/IBM/db2/V9.7B/lib64/libdb2e.so.1 (offset 
0x4a11f48) 
</Registers> 
<StackTrace> 
##### Object: /opt/IBM/db2/V9.7B/lib64/libdb2e.so.1 
__1cYsqlvCCCBuildNextLikeRule6FpnIsqlrr_cb_pknOsqlrxCollation_pp 
nPsqlvCCCLikeRule_6pCi8iipi_i_(0xffffffff8b0f0001,0xffffffff6229 
6d18,0x18b00000,0xb6c00,0xfffffffccd7f59f0,0x870f0000) + 0x11a8 
__1cbCsqlriCCCLikeComputeRulesCore6FpnIsqlrr_cb_pnKsqlz_value_3p 
nUsqlriCCCLikeWorkArea__i_(0xffffffff4beccba0,0x2,0x0,0xffffffff 
633b2728,0x0,0x1) + 0xa8c 
__1cYsqlriCCCLikeComputeRules6FpnIsqlrr_cb__i_(0xffffffff4beccba 
0,0x0,0x276823c,0x2,0xc8000,0xffffffff7c85a2c0) + 0x58 
__1cQsqldEvalDataPred6FpnNSQdDLD_DFM_WORK_pLpnKSQdDLD_DPRED__i_( 
0xffffffff63ee3710,0xfffffffccd7f6008,0xffffffff633b26b8,0x1788, 
0xffffffff633b2cd0,0xf808600220800) + 0x140 
__1cMsqldReadNorm6FpnNSQdDLD_DFM_WORK_l_i_(0xffffffff63ee3710,0x 
1e,0x6,0xffffffff63ee3888,0x1,0x0) + 0x1734 
__1cPsqldFetchDirect6FpnNSQdDLD_DFM_WORK__i_(0xffffffff63ee3710, 
0x0,0xffffffff63ee3788,0xffffffff63ee38d8,0x0,0xffffffff63ee3888 
) + 0x4740 
__1cHsqldfrd6FpnNSQdDLD_DFM_WORK__i_(0xffffffff63ee3710,0x205800 
1f,0xf808600220800,0xfffffffec316c000,0x0,0x1f) + 0x1040 
__1cMsqldRowFetch6FpnIsqeAgent_pnISQdDLD_CCB_LLppnKSQdDLD_VALUE_ 
pnISQdDLZ_RID_LpnMSQdDLD_ID_LIST_pnJSQdDLP_LSN8__i_(0x8,0xffffff 
ff7c85a2c0,0xffffffff63ee3710,0xfffe,0x0,0xffffffff633b21f0) + 
0x1f84
Problem-Zusammenfassung:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* all                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* upgrade to version 10.1 Fix Pack 3                           * 
****************************************************************
Local-Fix:
verfügbare FixPacks:
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 3a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Lösung
first fixed in version 10.1 Fix Pack 3
Workaround
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix
Weitere Daten
Datum - Problem gemeldet    :
Datum - Problem geschlossen :
Datum - der letzten Änderung:
22.04.2013
01.10.2013
01.10.2013
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos)
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version
10.1.0.3 FixList
10.1.0.3 FixList