DB2 - Problembeschreibung
Problem IC94881 | Status: Geschlossen |
ADMIN_MOVE_TABLE MIGHT RETURN SQL2103N RC=17 IF TARGET PRIMARY KEY INDEX DO NOT MATCH SOURCE PRIMARY KEY INDEX | |
Produkt: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A50 - DB2 | |
Problembeschreibung: | |
ADMIN_MOVE_TABLE might return SQL2103N rc=17 if PRIMARY Key indexes do not match. This can occur if there are UNIQUE Indexes created on the source table with the same columns, but different order. eg. $ db2 "create table db2inst1.tab1(c1 int not null, c2 int not null)" DB20000I The SQL command completed successfully. $ db2 "create unique index db2inst1.indx1 on db2inst1.tab1(c1,c2)" DB20000I The SQL command completed successfully. $ db2 "create unique index db2inst1.indx2 on db2inst1.tab1(c2,c1)" DB20000I The SQL command completed successfully. $ db2 "alter table db2inst1.tab1 add primary key(c2,c1)" SQL0598W Existing index "DB2INST1.INDX1" is used as the index for the primary key or a unique key. SQLSTATE=01550 $ db2 "select substr(indname,1,30), uniquerule from syscat.indexes where tabname='TAB1'" 1 UNIQUERULE ------------------------------ ---------- INDX1 P INDX2 U 2 record(s) selected. We could look to use either INDX1 or INDX2 for the Primary Key Index. This is working as design on the ALTER TABLE statement: See topic: Database administration > Administration concepts > Database objects > Constraints Reuse of indexes with unique or primary key constraints If you use the ALTER TABLE command to add a unique or primary key constraint to a partitioned table with a partitioned index, depending on the indexes that already exist, one might be altered to enforce the new constraint, or a new one might be created. When you run the ALTER TABLE statement to add or change a unique or primary key for a table, a check is performed to determine whether any existing index matches the unique or primary key being defined (INCLUDE columns are ignored). An index definition matches if it identifies the same set of columns, regardless of the order or the direction (for example ASC/DESC) of the columns. In the case of partitioned tables that have partitioned, non-unique indexes, if the index columns of the table being altered are not included among the columns that form the partition key, the index will not be considered a matching index. If the table does have a matching index definition, it will changed to be a UNIQUE index if it wasn't one already, and will marked as required by the system. If the table has more than one existing index that matches, then an existing unique index is selected. If there is more than one matching unique index, or if there are more than one matching non-unique indexes and no matching unique indexes, then a partitioned index is favoured. Otherwise the selection of an index is arbitrary. If no matching index is found, then a unique bidirectional index is automatically created for the columns. | |
Problem-Zusammenfassung: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * All Platforms * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * See Error Description * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Update to DB2 LUW v10.5 Fixpack 3 * **************************************************************** | |
Local-Fix: | |
Look to have only one INDEX that matches the PRIMARY KEY on the source table when using ADMIN_MOVE_TABLE. | |
verfügbare FixPacks: | |
DB2 Version 10.5 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Lösung | |
Problem Fixed In DB2 LUW v10.5 Fixpack 3 | |
Workaround | |
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix | |
Weitere Daten | |
Datum - Problem gemeldet : Datum - Problem geschlossen : Datum - der letzten Änderung: | 14.08.2013 03.03.2014 03.03.2014 |
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos) | |
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version | |
10.5.0.3 | |
10.5.0.3 |