DB2 - Problembeschreibung
Problem IC95319 | Status: Geschlossen |
FENCED ORACLE WRAPPER LEAKS MEMORY WHEN ITERATIVELY EXECUTES INSERT/UPDATE STATEMENTS INVOLVING A LOB COLUMN | |
Produkt: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A50 - DB2 | |
Problembeschreibung: | |
When some INSERT/UPDATE statements involving a LOB column are executed against Oracle nicknames iteratively, *Fenced* Oracle Wrapper may leak memory. This memory leak usually happens in a Q Replication scenario(target is Oracle): 1. QApply program tries to INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE target table in Oracle, 2. But the INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE operation fails (because of conflicting key on an INSERT, or NOTFOUND on a DELETE/UPDATE), 3. So QApply program inserts the IBMQREP_EXCEPTIONS table with the SQL code and other information for row changes that could not be applied. 4. QApply program continues to INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE target table in Oracle. NOTE: 1. The memory leak happens at 3. Normally the memory leak is not outstanding since QApply program does not have to inserts the IBMQREP_EXCEPTIONS table so frequently. 2. Although happens on the same case, but this issue is different than JR44859. JR44859 happens on both fenced and unfenced Oracle wrappers, while this issue only happens on a fenced Oracle wrapper. You can reproduce memory leak by following steps: 1. Create the federated objects and store procedure: drop wrapper net8@ create wrapper net8 options (db2_fenced 'Y')@ create server serv type oracle version '11g' wrapper net8 options(node 'ORANODE1',VARCHAR_NO_TRAILING_BLANKS 'Y')@ create user mapping for db2inst1 server serv options(remote_authid '<USERID>',remote_password '<PASSWORD>')@ SET PASSTHRU serv@ DROP TABLE TEST1@ DROP TABLE TEST2@ create table test1 (c1 varchar(10), c2 clob)@ create table test2 (c1 varchar(10), c2 clob)@ SET PASSTHRU RESET@ create nickname tm1 for serv."J15USER1"."TEST1"@ create nickname tm2 for serv."J15USER1"."TEST2"@ drop table test1@ create table test1 (c1 varchar(10),c2 clob)@ insert into test1 values('111','222')@ DROP PROCEDURE TP@ CREATE PROCEDURE TP() SPECIFIC TP LANGUAGE SQL NOT DETERMINISTIC EXTERNAL ACTION MODIFIES SQL DATA CALLED ON NULL INPUT INHERIT SPECIAL REGISTERS BEGIN DECLARE C1V VARCHAR(10); DECLARE C2V CLOB(32768); DECLARE DV VARCHAR(10); DECLARE FLAG INTEGER; declare cur cursor with hold for select * FROM test1 fetch first 1 rows only; open cur; fetch cur into C1V,C2V; close cur; COMMIT; SET FLAG=0; SET DV='AAA'; LOOP_IUD: LOOP DELETE FROM TM1 WHERE C1=DV; INSERT INTO TM2 VALUES(C1V,C2V); SET FLAG = FLAG + 1; IF (FLAG = 1000) THEN LEAVE LOOP_IUD; END IF; END LOOP LOOP_IUD; COMMIT; END@ 2. Run the store procedure and record the memory usage of the federated fmp process: console 1 console 2 ------------------- ------------------------------ delete from tm2 db2pd -fmp (find the fmp_pid) run #1 call tp() ps -elf|grep fmp_pid(record the memory usage) run #2 call tp() ps -elf|grep fmp_pid(record the memory usage) Run# FMP memory usage Memory leak ---- ---------------- ----------- 1 6546 2 6600 54 3 6664 64 4 6724 60 5 6788 64 | |
Problem-Zusammenfassung: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * The users are using fenced Oracle wrapper iteratively * * executes insert/update statements which has a lob column. * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * See Error Description * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to Federation Server V10.5FP3. * **************************************************************** | |
Local-Fix: | |
Alter the wrapper to use unfenced wrapper: ALTER WRAPPER <WRAPPER NAME> OPTIONS(SET DB2_FENCED 'N') | |
verfügbare FixPacks: | |
DB2 Version 10.5 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Lösung | |
The problem is firstly fixed in Federation Server V10.5FP3. | |
Workaround | |
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix | |
Weitere Daten | |
Datum - Problem gemeldet : Datum - Problem geschlossen : Datum - der letzten Änderung: | 27.08.2013 27.02.2014 27.02.2014 |
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos) | |
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version | |
10.5.0.3 | |
10.5.0.3 |