DB2 - Problembeschreibung
Problem IC96356 | Status: Geschlossen |
ONLINE BACKUP MIGHT BLOCK TRANSACTIONS THAT ARE DOING COMMIT. | |
Produkt: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A50 - DB2 | |
Problembeschreibung: | |
BACKUP DATABASE command prunes the "table space change history file (DB2TSCHG.HIS)", right before the end of the BACKUP DATABASE command. When an ONLINE BACKUP is pruning the DB2TSCHG.HIS file, it might block applications that are doing COMMIT at the same time. The problem happens to "full" BACKUP only, as opposed to "tablespace-level" BACKUP. To identify the problem, please issue "db2pd -stack all" command to generate stack files. Stack file of the BACKUP coordinator agent will have content similar to the following: =========================================== <StackTrace> sqlpPruneTsChgHistoryFile sqluhPruneDatabaseHistoryOnePass sqluhPruneDatabaseHistory sqlubupHistoryFile sqlubcka </StackTrace> <LatchInformation> Holding Latch type: (SQLO_LT_SQLP_LOGTS_LOG_FILES_INFO__latchLogTsInfo) </LatchInformation> =========================================== It's holding the 'SQLO_LT_SQLP_LOGTS_LOG_FILES_INFO__latchLogTsInfo' latch which is being waited by EDU named 'db2logts': =========================================== <StackTrace> sqloXlatchConflict sqlpDirtyPoolHandler sqloEDUEntry </StackTrace> <LatchInformation> Waiting on latch type: (SQLO_LT_SQLP_LOGTS_LOG_FILES_INFO__latchLogTsInfo) </LatchInformation> =========================================== Meanwhile, all agents that are doing COMMIT are stuck in one of the following stack traces: =========================================== sqloXlatchConflict sqlpUploadDirtyPoolEntry sqlpUploadDirtyPoolEntry sqlpEndUowRuntime sqlpxcm1 (or 'sqlpxcm2') or sqloSpinLockReleaseConflict sqlpUploadDirtyPoolEntry sqlpUploadDirtyPoolEntry sqlpEndUowRuntime sqlpxcm1 (or 'sqlpxcm2') or ossSleep sqlorest sqlpUploadDirtyPoolEntry sqlpUploadDirtyPoolEntry sqlpEndUowRuntime sqlpxcm1 (or 'sqlpxcm2') =========================================== If the DB2TSCHG.HIS file is big in size and too many entries need to be retained in the file (which is controlled by database configuration parameter named REC_HIS_RETENTN), the BACKUP DATABASE command might take a long time in pruning the DB2TSCHG.HIS file. As a result, there is a good chance to hit the problem. The fix of the APAR will improve the performance of pruning DB2TSCHG.HIS file, hence minimize the chance of hitting the problem. | |
Problem-Zusammenfassung: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * All users of version 10.5 on Linux, Unix and Windows * * platforms. * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * See Error Description * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Update to DB2 LUW Version 10.5 Fix Pack 4 or higher levels. * **************************************************************** | |
Local-Fix: | |
1) Set DB2 registry variable DB2_COLLECT_TS_REC_INFO=OFF to stop updating DB2TSCHG.HIS file, which can definitely avoid the problem. 2) Set a small value to parameter REC_HIS_RETENTN. 3) Prune the DB2TSCHG.HIS file manually by "PRUNE HISTORY" command to reduce the size of the file. | |
verfügbare FixPacks: | |
DB2 Cancun Release 10.5.0.4 (also known as Fix Pack 4) for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Lösung | |
First fixed in DB2 LUW Version 10.5 Fix Pack 4. | |
Workaround | |
1) Set DB2 registry variable DB2_COLLECT_TS_REC_INFO=OFF to stop updating DB2TSCHG.HIS file, which can definitely avoid the problem. 2) Set a small value to parameter REC_HIS_RETENTN. 3) Prune the DB2TSCHG.HIS file manually by "PRUNE HISTORY" command to reduce the size of the file. | |
Weitere Daten | |
Datum - Problem gemeldet : Datum - Problem geschlossen : Datum - der letzten Änderung: | 26.09.2013 19.09.2014 19.09.2014 |
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos) | |
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version | |
10.5.0.4 |