home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Neueste VersionenFixList
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Haben Sie Probleme? - Kontaktieren Sie uns.
Kostenlos registrieren anmeldung-x26
Kontaktformular kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problembeschreibung

Problem IT01914 Status: Geschlossen

HASH LATCH CONTENTION CAUSES POOR PERFORMANCE

Produkt:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A10 - DB2
Problembeschreibung:
This APAR applies to all platforms under the combination of the 
following conditions: 
1) A LOCKLIST greater than 8000 pages is used. 
2) Many applications are accessing one specific table 
concurrently via SELECT or DELETE queries, or via searched 
DELETE or CLOSE CURSOR operations against cursor opened FOR READ 
ONLY. 
 
If you suspect that you are hitting this problem, collect "db2pd 
-latches" at various intervals.  The output that is relevant in 
this case is column 2 (Holder), column 3 (Waiter) and column 5 
(LatchType).  If you see many lines of output that have a 
LatchType of SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch (lock manager hash 
table latch) and have the same Holder value (EDU ID of the EDU 
holding the latch) with various Waiter values (EDU ID of an EDU 
waiting on the latch), then it is possible that you might be 
hitting this issue.  Note that multiple unique holders may be 
present, as is the case in this example. 
Address            Holder     Waiter     Filename 
LOC        LatchType            HoldCount 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     213934     sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     129857     sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     140132     sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
... repeats many times ... 
... with the same Holder value ... 
... with varying Waiter values ... 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     1186579    sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     1190691    sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     1200514    sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     1202054    sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     800313     sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     467072     sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
... skip some other entries ... 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 1156509    213934     sqlpLockInternal.h 520 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 1 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 1156509    129857     sqlpLockInternal.h 520 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 1 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 1156509    140132     sqlpLockInternal.h 520 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 1 
... repeats many times ... 
... with the same Holder value (but different than the Holder 
value above) ... 
... with varying Waiter values ... 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 1156509    148094     sqlpLockInternal.h 520 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 1 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 1156509    149379     sqlpLockInternal.h 520 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 1 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 1156509    160167     sqlpLockInternal.h 520 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 1 
... skip other entries ... 
Once you have confirmed from "db2pd -latches" output that your 
environment might be suffering from this issue, you can collect 
additional information from agents to confirm that this specific 
problem is the issue in your environment. 
For each of the holder values in the "db2pd -latches" output, 
collect "db2pd -stacks <holder_EDU_ID>" to dump the stack trace 
of the EDUs waiting on the hash latch.  This may need to be 
collected mutiple times in order to capture an instance when the 
EDU is actively holding the latch. 
The holder EDU stack that indicates the problem scenario looks 
like this: 
-------Frame------ ------Function + Offset------ 
0x09000000000F7A94 thread_wait + 0x94 
0x09000000397D1960 getConflictComplex__17SQLO_SLATCH_CAS64FCUl + 
0x2A8 
0x0900000039818BB8 getConflict__17SQLO_SLATCH_CAS64FCUl + 0x78 
0x09000000397F8760 sqlplrl__FP9sqeBsuEduP14SQLP_LOCK_INFOCUl + 
0xDE4 
0x09000000397F6F50 sqldmclo__FP8sqeAgentPP8SQLD_CCBi + 0x3CC 
0x090000003979CB20 sqlriclo__FP8sqlrr_cbP9sqlri_taoi + 0xA0 
0x090000003979C960 sqlricjp__FP8sqlrr_cbP12sqlri_opparmilT4 + 
0x8A4 
0x09000000396DCC2C sqlricls_simple__FP8sqlrr_cbil + 0xB5C 
0x09000000396D6B84 sqlrr_process_close_request__FP8sqlrr_cbiN32 
+ 0x154 
0x09000000396D6560 
sqlrr_close__FP14db2UCinterfaceP15db2UCCursorInfo + 0xD64 
 
In addition, for various waiter values in the "db2pd -latches" 
output, collect "db2pd -stacks <waiter_EDU_ID>".  Again, you may 
need to collect this multiple times in order to capture an 
instance when the EDU is actively waiting on the latch. 
The waiter EDU stack that indicates the problem scenario looks 
like this: 
-------Frame------ ------Function + Offset------ 
0x09000000000F7A94 thread_wait + 0x94 
0x09000000397D1960 getConflictComplex__17SQLO_SLATCH_CAS64FCUl + 
0x2A8 
0x0900000039818BB8 getConflict__17SQLO_SLATCH_CAS64FCUl + 0x78 
0x09000000398189E0 sqlplrq__FP9sqeBsuEduP14SQLP_LOCK_INFO + 0x98 
0x090000003978AFD8 
.sqldLockTable.fdpr.clone.161__FP8sqeAgentP14SQLP_LOCK_INFOUiUsi 
+ 0xC4 
0x090000003978B5E0 
sqldScanOpen__FP8sqeAgentP14SQLD_SCANINFO1P14SQLD_SCANINFO2PPv + 
0x544 
0x0900000039798DF4 sqlriopn__FP8sqlrr_cbP9sqlri_taoPi + 0x484 
0x09000000397AE240 sqlrita__FP8sqlrr_cb + 0x58 
0x09000000397AE0C8 sqlriSectInvoke__FP8sqlrr_cbP12sqlri_opparm + 
0x34 
0x09000000396D37EC 
sqlrr_process_fetch_request__FP14db2UCinterface + 0xF08 
0x09000000396D17C4 
sqlrr_open__FP14db2UCinterfaceP15db2UCCursorInfo + 0x12E8 
 
If the three primary conditions are met, and holder EDU and 
waiter EDU stacks match those listed above, then you might 
obtain relief after applying the local fix or by upgrading to a 
newer level of DB2 that contains the fix for this APAR. 
Local Fix 
Apply the following registry setting and restart DB2. 
DB2_KEEPTABLELOCK=TRANSACTION
Problem-Zusammenfassung:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* All users                                                    * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 V101FP5 or higher version.                    * 
****************************************************************
Local-Fix:
DB2_KEEPTABLELOCK=TRANSACTION
Lösung
Fixed on DB2 V101FP5 or higher version.
Workaround
DB2_KEEPTABLELOCK=TRANSACTION
Weitere Daten
Datum - Problem gemeldet    :
Datum - Problem geschlossen :
Datum - der letzten Änderung:
20.05.2014
18.11.2014
18.11.2014
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos)
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version
10.1.0.5 FixList