home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Neueste VersionenFixList
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Haben Sie Probleme? - Kontaktieren Sie uns.
Kostenlos registrieren anmeldung-x26
Kontaktformular kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problembeschreibung

Problem IT04408 Status: Geschlossen

SQLSTATISTICS ROUTINE, CLI/ODBC SQLSTATISTICS CALL, JDBC GETINDE XINFO CALL
RETURN SQLCODE -413 FOR LARGE VALUES OF CARDINALITY

Produkt:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problembeschreibung:
Currently, the SYSIBM.SQLSTATISTICS routine and the 
corresponding CLI/ODBC SQLStatistics () andd JDBC getIndexInfo 
calls, return SQLCODE -413 (Overflow occurred during numeric 
data type conversion) if the CARDINALITY returned exceeds 
2147483647. 
 
Per the ODBC specification,  we return CARDINALITY as INTEGER. 
However it is defined as BIGINT in the referenced table 
SYSIBM.SQLSTATISTICS. So, the SQLSTATISTICS routine CASTSs 
CARDINALITY to INTEGER before returning this value. 
 
If the CARDINALITY value returned is greater than the maximum 
allowable INTEGER value (2147483647), then a numeric overflow 
error will occur on the data type conversion (SQLCODE -413). 
 
The design will be changed to return 2147483647 (largest INTEGER 
value) when CARDINALITY cannot fit into INTEGER. 
 
This design is consistent with other IBM-defined views and 
routines which reference CARDINALITY. 
 
This is the same issue as DB2 9.7 APAR IC70444.
Problem-Zusammenfassung:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* DB2 LUW users                                                * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 9.7 FP11 or later                             * 
****************************************************************
Local-Fix:
Lösung
The problem is fixed in DB2 9.7 FP11
Workaround
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix
Weitere Daten
Datum - Problem gemeldet    :
Datum - Problem geschlossen :
Datum - der letzten Änderung:
16.09.2014
07.10.2015
07.10.2015
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos)
9.7.FP11
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version
9.7.0.11 FixList