DB2 - Problem description
Problem IC61960 | Status: Closed |
GROUPING SETS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED IN AN ORDER BY CLAUSE | |
product: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 950 - DB2 | |
Problem description: | |
An ORDER BY clause should not allow grouping sets. This is correctly documented but not properly enforced. The following invalid query should return SQLSTATE 42803: SELECT SALES_PERSON, MONTH(SALES_DATE) AS MONTH, SUM(SALES) AS UNITS_SOLD FROM SALES GROUP BY SALES_PERSON, MONTH(SALES_DATE) ORDER BY GROUPING SETS( SALES_PERSON, MONTH(SALES_DATE) ) | |
Problem Summary: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * ALL * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * An ORDER BY clause should not allow grouping sets. This is * * correctly documented but not properly enforced. * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to db2 version v9.5 fp5 * **************************************************************** | |
Local Fix: | |
Remove GROUPING SETS from the ORDER BY clause | |
available fix packs: | |
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Solution | |
Problem was first fixed in Version 9.5 FixPak 5 | |
Workaround | |
not known / see Local fix | |
BUG-Tracking | |
forerunner : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC61992 IC61993 follow-up : | |
Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 09.07.2009 23.12.2009 23.12.2009 |
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.5., 9.5.FP5 | |
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) | |
9.5.0.5 |