home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC62070 Status: Closed

SNAPSHOT INFO REPORTS A VERY HIGH MAXCOORDAGENTS VALUE.

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problem description:
Database snapshot can report a very high value for MaxCoord 
agents in the database snapshot as follows: 
 
              Database Snapshot 
 
Database name                              = XXXX 
Database path = 
/d/ny001idb00/d1/ibmdb2/nytxt370/nytxt370/NODE0001/SQL00002/ 
<snip> 
 
Maximum coordinating agents                = 4294967295 
 
 
In a DPF env following query also reports this behavior. 
 
select dec(DBPARTITIONNUM,3) as DP# ,int(CONNECTIONS_TOP) as 
con_top 
,dec(COORD_AGENTS_TOP,11) ca_top ,int(AGENTS_TOP) as agt_top 
,int(TOTAL_CONS) as tot_con_inst_strt ,int(TOTAL_SEC_CONS) as 
tot_sa_con 
,int(APPLS_CUR_CONS) as active_con ,int(APPLS_IN_DB2) as 
active_ca 
,int(NUM_ASSOC_AGENTS) as #_sa FROM SYSIBMADM.SNAPDB order by 1 
 
DP# CON_TOP CA_TOP AGT_TOP TOT_CON_INST_STRT TOT_SA_CON 
ACTIVE_CON 
ACTIVE_CA #_SA 
----- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------------- 
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 
1. 300 4294967295. 189 391481 50347 50 5 58 
2. 111 4294967294. 134 327966 316624 21 0 8 
3. 102 4294967295. 99 149553 138207 9 0 8 
4. 91 4294967293. 84 149854 138244 9 0 6 
5. 91 4294967295. 86 149571 138223 9 0 5 
 
  5 record(s) selected. 
 
 
This seem to occur after the database is activated and some 
activity has happened against the db.
Problem Summary:
DATABASE SNAPSHOT INFO REPORTS A VERY HIGH MAXCOORDAGENTS VALUE. 
 
Database snapshot can report a very high value for MaxCoord 
 
agents in the database snapshot as follows: 
 
              Database Snapshot 
 
Database name                              = XXXX 
Database path = 
/d/ny001idb00/d1/ibmdb2/nytxt370/nytxt370/NODE0001/SQL00002/ 
<snip> 
 
Maximum coordinating agents                = 4294967295 
 
 
In a DPF env following query also reports this behavior. 
 
select dec(DBPARTITIONNUM,3) as DP# ,int(CONNECTIONS_TOP) as 
con_top ,dec(COORD_AGENTS_TOP,11) ca_top ,int(AGENTS_TOP) as 
agt_top ,int(TOTAL_CONS) as tot_con_inst_strt 
,int(TOTAL_SEC_CONS) as tot_sa_con ,int(APPLS_CUR_CONS) as 
active_con ,int(APPLS_IN_DB2) as active_ca 
,int(NUM_ASSOC_AGENTS) as #_sa FROM SYSIBMADM.SNAPDB order by 1 
DP# CON_TOP CA_TOP AGT_TOP TOT_CON_INST_STRT TOT_SA_CON 
ACTIVE_CON ACTIVE_CA #_SA 
----- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------------- 
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 
1. 300 4294967295. 189 391481 50347 50 5 58 
2. 111 4294967294. 134 327966 316624 21 0 8 
3. 102 4294967295. 99 149553 138207 9 0 8 
4. 91 4294967293. 84 149854 138244 9 0 6 
5. 91 4294967295. 86 149571 138223 9 0 5 
 
  5 record(s) selected. 
 
This seem to occur after the database is activated and some 
activity has happened against the db.
Local Fix:
available fix packs:
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 1 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 3a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Solution
First fixed in v9.7 FP1
Workaround
n/a
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
19.07.2009
04.02.2010
04.02.2010
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
9.7.FP1
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.7.0.1 FixList