DB2 - Problem description
Problem IC62559 | Status: Closed |
DEPENDSON RELATIONSHIP SHOULDN'T BE CREATED FOR PRIVATE NETWORK | |
product: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 | |
Problem description: | |
DependsOn relationship shouldn't be created for private network for HADR setup. When private network is down, the expected procedure should looks like this: ifconfig en5 down the hadr db resource gets locked (no takeover) ifconfig en5 up resource gets unlocked This is because if the private network is down, there will never be any HADR synchronization possible. So just keep the primary where it is as client apps will still be able to use it, and later when the private network problem is resolved, the standby will catchup. | |
Problem Summary: | |
Problem Description: DEPENDSON RELATIONSHIP SHOULDN'T BE CREATED FOR PRIVATE NETWORK Problem Summary: DependsOn relationship shouldn't be created for private network for HADR setup. When private network is down, the expected procedure should looks like this: ifconfig en5 down the hadr db resource gets locked (no takeover) ifconfig en5 up resource gets unlocked This is because if the private network is down, there will never be any HADR synchronization possible. So just keep the primary where it is as client apps will still be able to use it, and later when the private network problem is resolved, the standby will catchup. | |
Local Fix: | |
For this to happen you need to remove the relationship between private network and the instance: lsrel make sure the rg for that relationship is offline rmrel -s "Name like '%private%'" | |
available fix packs: | |
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 1 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Solution | |
Problem is first fixed in Version 9.7 Fix Pack 1 | |
Workaround | |
For this to happen you need to remove the relationship between private network and the instance: lsrel make sure the rg for that relationship is offline rmrel -s "Name like '%private%'" | |
Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 17.08.2009 21.12.2009 21.12.2009 |
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.7.FP1 | |
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) | |
9.7.0.1 |