home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC63225 Status: Closed

DB2 INSTANCE CRASHES ON WINDOWS 64 WITH ACCESS ERROR FROM DB2AGENT IN
SQLERISFMPVALIDFORUSE

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problem description:
The DB2 instance trapped with a SAP workload with access 
error where 2 of the dbm configuration parameters are set to 
 
KEEPFENCED=YES and FENCED_POOL value is significantly 
smaller than the value of MAX_COORDAGENTS and 
MAX_CONNECTIONS. 
. 
The db2 registry variable DB2_AGENT_CACHING_FMP is set to NO. 
. 
The workload contains concurrent connections from more than 10 
database clients.   There are calls to the SYSPROC.ADMIN_CMD 
and SYSPROC.ENV_GET_SYS_INFO two routines they are both not 
thread-safe. 
. 
The trapped db2agent has the following stack: 
<StackTrace> 
sqlerIsFmpValidForUse 
sqlerFindPoolFmp 
sqlerGetFmpFromPool 
sqlerInvokeFencedRoutine 
sqlrical 
sqlriSectInvoke 
sqlrr_process_execute_request 
sqlrr_execute 
sqljs_ddm_excsqlstt 
sqljsParse 
sqljsSqlam 
sqljsDriveRequests 
sqljsDrdaAsInnerDriver 
sqljsDrdaAsDriver 
sqeAgent::RunEDU 
sqzEDUObj::EDUDriver 
sqlzRunEDU 
sqloSpawnEDU 
</StackTrace>
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* DB2 instance with dbm cfg parameter KEEPFENCED=YES, and      * 
* registry variable DB2_AGENT_CACHING_FMP=NO and running       * 
* SYSPROC.ADMIN_CMD and other not thread-safe routines         * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* This trap happen on Windows because the IPC resource that is * 
* associated with a fmp row is                                 * 
* cleaned up before the row is removed, and a db2agent is able * 
* to find that row in the fmp                                  * 
* table.   When the db2agent tries to determine if the fmp     * 
* exists or not using its the IPC resources,                   * 
* it traped accessing a NULL pointer.                          * 
* .                                                            * 
* The registry setting of DB2_AGENT_CACHING_FMP=NO forces each * 
* fmp worker to be returned                                    * 
* to the pool each time after it has finished executing a      * 
* routine for a db2agent.   Thus this issue is                 * 
* more noticeable under this setting.                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Install V97 fixpack 1                                        * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Use the following step to make sure db2agents caches fmps: 
db2stop force 
db2set DB2_AGENT_CACHING_FMP=YES 
db2start
available fix packs:
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 1 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 3a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Solution
The fix allows DB2 to avoid such trap with added check on the 
IPC resource pointer.
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
16.09.2009
15.01.2010
15.01.2010
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
9.7.FP1
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.7.0.1 FixList