home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC64159 Status: Closed

HIGH SYSTEM CPU DURING ONLINE BACKUP DUE TO LARGE NUMBER OF DB2BM
THREADS

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problem description:
Running an online backup may cause very high system cpu usage on 
the system. 
 
This is caused by the number of db2bm threads created compared 
to the number of db2med threads actually writing out the data 
to the backup location. 
 
This APAR addresses a change to the autonomic tuning algorithm 
to prevent the creation of an excessive number of db2bm threads.
Problem Summary:
USERS AFFECTED: All 
 
PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: 
see ERROR DESCRIPTION
Local Fix:
Manually adjust the number of db2bm threads during backup 
using option PARALLELISM 
 
e.g. 
db2 backup db <DBNAME> online load <LIBRARY> open <# SESSIONS> 
sessions parallelism <# BUFFERMANIPULATORS>
available fix packs:
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 1 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 3a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Solution
Problem was first fixed in Version 9.7 Fix Pack 1
Workaround
see LOCAL FIX
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
26.10.2009
16.12.2009
16.12.2009
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
9.7.FP1
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.7.0.1 FixList