DB2 - Problem description
Problem IC65111 | Status: Closed |
IBM.DATA.DB2.ENTITY.DLL IS NOT CONFIGURED CORRECTLY IN THE GAC WHEN 64-BIT DB2 IS INSTALLED | |
product: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 | |
Problem description: | |
When 64-bit DB2 is installed on a 64-bit windows, if it is the default copy on the system, the IBM .NET Data Provider DLLs will be deployed to GAC and configured with the system. Although the DB2.Data.DB2.Entity.dll is put into GAC during the install, it was not deployed and configured correctly. | |
Problem Summary: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * 64-bit DB2 on 64-bit windows * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * When 64-bit DB2 is installed on a 64-bit windows, if it is * * the * * default copy on the system, the IBM .NET Data Provider DLLs * * will * * be deployed to GAC and configured with the system. * * * * Although the DB2.Data.DB2.Entity.dll is put into GAC during * * the * * install, it was not deployed and configured correctly. * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * The work-around for this problem is: to use the gacutil.exe * * tool to deploy the DB2.Data.DB2.Entity.dll to GAC after the * * db2 install. * * * * As this problem is fixed in v97fp2, the 64-bit DB2Entity * * data provider will be deployed to GAC when the 64-bit db2 of * * the default copy is installed * **************************************************************** | |
Local Fix: | |
Use the gacutil.exe tool to deploy the DB2.Data.DB2.Entity.dll to GAC after the db2 install. | |
available fix packs: | |
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Solution | |
This problem is fixed in V97FP2. | |
Workaround | |
not known / see Local fix | |
BUG-Tracking | |
forerunner : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC65112 follow-up : | |
Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 11.12.2009 17.05.2010 17.05.2010 |
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.7.FP2 | |
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) | |
9.7.0.2 |