DB2 - Problem description
Problem IC65587 | Status: Closed |
Event view log is not accurate when UPDATE INDEX for a text search index finds empty documents in the document set. | |
product: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 950 - DB2 | |
Problem description: | |
When UPDATE INDEX for a text search index finds empty documents in the set of documents it operates on, there are scenarios where the summary logged in the event view is not accurate. The count for the number of empty documents skipped is always reported as "0" for cases when the update index operation is an incremental update. Consequently, the sum of the documents inserted, documents updated, documents deleted, empty documents skipped and the documents not indexed will not add up to the number of rows being reported as processed. Initial updates are not affected by this problem. For example: After completion of an incremental update, the record in the event view is: - 2009-10-23-17.42.18.850674 1 0 CIE00005I DB2 Text Search Index update statistics: "138644" number of rows processed. "112434" documents inserted, "0" documents updated, "0" documents deleted, "0" empty documents skipped successfully, and "0" documents not indexed due to document errors. The correct record should have been: - 2009-10-23-17.42.18.850674 1 0 CIE00005I DB2 Text Search Index update statistics: "138644" number of rows processed. "112434" documents inserted, "0" documents updated, "0" documents deleted, "26210" empty documents skipped successfully, and "0" documents not indexed due to document errors. | |
Problem Summary: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * all platforms * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * When UPDATE INDEX for a text search index findsempty * * documents in the set of documents it operates on,thereare * * scenarios where the summary logged in the event view isnot * * accurate.The count for the number of empty documentsskipped * * is always reported as "0" for cases when the updateindex * * operation is an incremental update. Consequently, thesum of * * the documents inserted, documents updated, documentsdeleted, * * empty documents skipped and the documents notindexedwill not * * add up to the number of rows being reported asprocessed. * * Initial updates are not affected by thisproblem.For * * example:After completion of an incrementalupdate, the record * * in the event view is:-2009-10-23-17.42.18.850674 1 * * 0CIE00005IDB2 Text Search Index update statistics: * * "138644"number ofrows processed. "112434" documents * * inserted, "0"documentsupdated, "0" documents deleted, "0" * * empty documents skippedsuccessfully, and "0" documents not * * indexed due to documenterrors.The correct record should have * * been:-2009-10-23-17.42.18.850674 1 * * 0CIE00005IDB2 Text Search Index update statistics: * * "138644"number ofrows processed. "112434" documents * * inserted, "0"documentsupdated, "0" documents deleted, * * "26210" empty documentsskipped successfully, and "0" * * documents not indexed due todocument errors. * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 6 * **************************************************************** | |
Local Fix: | |
available fix packs: | |
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 6a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Solution | |
This problem is fixed in DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 6. Users should be able to see the number of skipped empty documents in the event view. Following is an example of what a user would see in the event view: - 2009-10-23-17.42.18.850674 1 0 CIE 00005I DB2 Text Search Index update statistics: "138644" num ber of rows processed. "112434" documents inserted, "0" doc uments updated, "0" documents deleted, "26210" empty doc uments skipped successfully, and "0" documents not indexed due to document errors. | |
Workaround | |
not known / see Local fix | |
Comment | |
Problem fixed in a Fix Pack. | |
BUG-Tracking | |
forerunner : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC65738 follow-up : | |
Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 14.01.2010 22.06.2010 22.06.2010 |
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.5.FP6 | |
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) |