|
Problem IC66591
|
Status: Closed |
SYSPROC.AUTOMAINT_SET_POLICY DOES NOT ALLOW TO SET DAYSOFMONTH INCLUDE 8 OR 18 |
| product: |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 |
| Problem description: |
SYSPROC.AUTOMAINT_SET_POLICY returns SQL1437 if 8 or 18 is part
of <DaysOfMonth>.
SQL1437N The XML in the automatic maintenance policy file or
LOB parameter
passed to SYSPROC.AUTOMAINT_SET_POLICY or
SYSPROC.AUTOMAINT_SET_POLICYFILE is
not valid at line number "1" and column number "250".
Validation error
message: "Datatype error: Type: InvalidDatatypeValueExcepti".
SQLSTATE=5U0ZZ
See attachment. Easy to reproduce (also on DB2 9.7). |
| Problem Summary: |
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED: *
* automaint_set_policyfile stored procedure *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: *
* SYSPROC.AUTOMAINT_SET_POLICY returns SQL1437 if 8 or *
* 18ispartof <DaysOfMonth>. *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION: *
* Install v97fp2 *
**************************************************************** |
| Local Fix: |
|
| available fix packs: |
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 3a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
|
| Solution |
With the changes to the schema, no longer we are returning
SQL1437 error. |
| Workaround |
No temp fix is available |
| Timestamps |
Date - problem reported :
Date - problem closed :
Date - last modified :
| 23.02.2010
31.05.2010
31.05.2010 |
| Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) |
9.7.FP2
|
| Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) |
| 9.7.0.2
|
 |
