DB2 - Problem description
Problem IC66888 | Status: Closed |
FEDERATED QUERY HAVING SCALAR CORRELATED SUBQUERY PREDICATE COULD RETURN INCORRECT RESULT. | |
product: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 980 - DB2 | |
Problem description: | |
Federated query having scalar correlated subquery predicate could return incorrect result. Here are some conditions which could cause this - 1. It is a federated query. 2. Query predicate involves scalar correlated subquery whose equivalent join columns contain unique key. A sample predicate is: "val_or_col_1 >= (select val_or_col_2 from subQTab where subQTab.c1 = outerTab.colX and subQTab.c2 = val_or_col_3)" The subquery equivalent join columns are (c1, c2). It requires primary key or unique index created on one or two out of (c1, c2). | |
Problem Summary: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * Only federated queries along with the two additional * * conditions which have to met (see "ERROR DESCRIPTION" for * * details). * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * Without this APAR, customer is exposed to the issue as * * described in the "ERROR DESCRIPTION" section. * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to DB2 Version 9.8, Fixpack 3. * **************************************************************** | |
Local Fix: | |
If DB2COMPOPT registry is currently unset, issue "db2set DB2COMPOPT=0,16". Otherwise, consult DB2 service for further assistance. | |
available fix packs: | |
DB2 Version 9.8 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Solution | |
First fixed in DB2 Version 9.8, Fixpack 3. | |
Workaround | |
not known / see Local fix | |
Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 05.03.2010 08.11.2012 08.11.2012 |
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.8.FP3 | |
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) | |
9.8.0.3 |