DB2 - Problem description
Problem IC66916 | Status: Closed |
JCC APPLICATION RETURN -4499 "UNSUPPORTED DDM OBJECT CODE POINT:0X220A" WHILE PROPERTY DEFERPREPARES = TRUE | |
product: | |
DB2 CONNECT / DB2CONNCT / 950 - DB2 | |
Problem description: | |
JCC Type 4 application return -4499 "Unsupported DDM object code point: 0x220a" while property deferPrepares = true and connect to iSeries through DB2 Connect. The code snippet may generate above error ---------------------- String sql = "update test set col2 = ? " ; PreparedStatment st = con.prepareStatement (sql) ; java.math.BigDecimal val = new java.math.BigDecimal("300.20"); st.setBigDecimal(1,val) int rc = st.executeUpdate(); .... ---------------------- Type 2 application connecting to iSeries directly works fine. | |
Problem Summary: | |
**************************************************************** USERS AFFECTED: Java application calling a setBigDecimal() function against the system which supported extended decimal precision. **************************************************************** PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: JCC Type 4 application return -4499 "Unsupported DDM object code point: 0x220a" while property deferPrepares = true and connect to iSeries through DB2 Connect. The code snippet may generate above error ---------------------- String sql = "update test set col2 = ? " ; PreparedStatment st = con.prepareStatement (sql) ; java.math.BigDecimal val = new java.math.BigDecimal("300.20"); st.setBigDecimal(1,val) int rc = st.executeUpdate(); .... ---------------------- Type 2 application connecting to iSeries directly works fine. | |
Local Fix: | |
set deferPrepares = false | |
available fix packs: | |
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Solution | |
First Fixed in DB2 Version 9.5 Fixpack 6 | |
Workaround | |
not known / see Local fix | |
BUG-Tracking | |
forerunner : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC66919 follow-up : | |
Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 08.03.2010 28.05.2010 28.05.2010 |
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.5.FP6 | |
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) |