home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC66994 Status: Closed

DB2PD SHOWS INCORRECT VALUES FOR LOGSECOND, AS A UNSIGNED INTEGER

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 980 - DB2
Problem description:
The LOGSECOND db cfg parameter is set to -1 but when looking at 
the db2pd output it shows 65535 which is incorrect. 
 
Take database Sample as an example. 
First, update the value of LOGSECOND as -1: 
DB2 UPDATE DATABASE CONFIGURATION FOR sample USING LOGSECOND -1 
Then run below command to get the value of LOGSECOND, it would 
show 65535 instead of -1. 
db2pd -db sample -dbcfg | \grep -i LOGSECOND
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* The LOGSECOND db cfg parameter is set to -1 but when looking * 
* at the db2pd output it shows 65535 which is incorrect.       * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See error description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Problem fixed in DB2 Version  9.8 FixPack 3                  * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
available fix packs:
DB2 Version 9.8 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.8 Fix Pack 4 for AIX and Linux
DB2 Version 9.8 Fix Pack 5 for AIX and Linux

Solution
Problem fixed in DB2 Version  9.8 FixPack 3
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
09.03.2010
03.01.2011
03.01.2011
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
9.8.FP3
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.8.0.3 FixList