home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC70679 Status: Closed

SERVER OPTIONS NEED TO BE ADDED TO ADJUST COST ESTIMATION FOR FETCHING DATA
FROM REMOTE SERVER IN CERTAIN ENVIRONMENT

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 950 - DB2
Problem description:
In certain environment, cost for fetching massive rows from 
remote server is over-cost, while execution of a remote 
statement multi-times is under-cost. As a result, IFS chooses a 
NLJN which fetches remote data for multi-times, instead of 
choosing the HSJN which fetches all data of a remote table at 
one time, and the performance could be bad with the NLJN.
Problem Summary:
Problem Description: 
SERVER OPTIONS NEED TO BE ADDED TO ADJUST COST ESTIMATION FOR 
FETCHING DATA FROM REMOTE SERVER IN CERTAIN ENVIRONMENT 
Problem Summary: 
In certain environment, cost for fetching massive rows from 
remote server is over-cost, while execution of a remote 
statement multi-times is under-cost. As a result, IFS chooses a 
NLJN which fetches remote data for multi-times, instead of 
choosing the HSJN which fetches all data of a remote table at 
one time, and the performance could be bad with the NLJN.
Local Fix:
Use plan hints, explicit selectivity, stats views to force the 
HSJN plan.
available fix packs:
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Solution
Problem is first fixed in Version 9.5 Fixpack 7
Workaround
Use plan hints, explicit selectivity, stats views to force the 
HSJN plan.
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
20.08.2010
11.02.2011
11.02.2011
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
9.5.FP7
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.1.0.7 FixList
9.5.0.7 FixList