DB2 - Problem description
Problem IC71254 | Status: Closed |
POSSIBLE INCORRECT RESULT ON RECURSIVE VIEWS JOIN TO A TABLE ON UNIQUE COLUMN | |
product: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 980 - DB2 | |
Problem description: | |
An SQL statement with a recursive view using UNION ALL that joins to a table on a set of columns that forms a unique key may return incorrect results. For example: CREATE TABLE RELATION(ID INTEGER, PARENTID INTEGER, FLAG CHAR(1)); -- This unique index is required to produce the incorrect results output CREATE UNIQUE INDEX UK1 ON RELATION(ID); CREATE VIEW HIRARCHY(ID, PARENTID, DEPTH) AS WITH TREE (ID, PARENTID, DEPTH) AS (SELECT ID, PARENTID, 1 AS DEPTH FROM RELATION ROOT UNION ALL SELECT CHILD.ID, TREE.PARENTID, DEPTH+1 FROM TREE, RELATION CHILD WHERE TREE.ID = CHILD.PARENTID) SELECT * FROM TREE ; INSERT INTO RELATION VALUES (1,2,'Y'),(2,3,'N'); SELECT H.ID, H.PARENTID, DEPTH FROM HIRARCHY H,RELATION R WHERE H.ID = R.ID AND R.FLAG = 'Y'; The correct result is 2 rows. ID PARENTID DEPTH ----------- ----------- ----------- 1 2 1 1 3 2 DB2 incorrectly returns only the first row. This problem is first introduced in DB2 version 9.5 Fix Pack 6 and 9.7 Fix Pack 3. | |
Problem Summary: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * All DB2 users * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * As described in the APAR problem description section. * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to V9.8 FP1. * **************************************************************** | |
Local Fix: | |
db2set DB2COMPOPT=x,65536+y where x and y are the values currently set in the system. and restart the DB2 instance | |
available fix packs: | |
DB2 Version 9.8 Fix Pack 4 for AIX and Linux | |
Solution | |
The problem was fixed in V9.8 FP4. | |
Workaround | |
not known / see Local fix | |
Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 17.09.2010 29.07.2011 29.07.2011 |
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.8.FP1, 9.8.FP4 | |
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) | |
9.8.0.4 |