|
Problem IC73207
|
Status: Closed |
Actual backup image size is not written into the db2diag.log file when backing up to a vendor. |
| product: |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 |
| Problem description: |
In DB2 v9.7 the actual backup image size is not written into the
db2diag.log file when backing up to a vendor as was done in
previous version. Below is an example of the actual backup image
size information that will be dumped into db2daig.log file when
backup is finished before DB2 v9.7.
2010-11-16-00.31.04.571407+000 E1062712A481 LEVEL: Info
PID : 1134598 TID : 42406 PROC : db2sysc
0
INSTANCE: db2inst1 NODE : 000 DB : PA1
APPHDL : 0-9 APPID:
*LOCAL.db2inst1.101115233458
AUTHID : DB2INST1
EDUID : 42406 EDUNAME: db2agent (SAMPLE) 0
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, database utilities, sqlubcka, probe:832
MESSAGE : Actual size of backup in bytes:
DATA #1 : unsigned integer, 8 bytes
263884660736 |
| Problem Summary: |
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED: *
* V97 users doing database backup *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: *
* In prior releases a size estimate, and actual size entry was *
* logged to the diaglog. This was removed in v97 *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION: *
* get v9.7fp5 *
**************************************************************** |
| Local Fix: |
No known local fix |
| available fix packs: |
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
|
| Solution |
The probes will now be seen. |
| Workaround |
not known / see Local fix |
| Timestamps |
Date - problem reported :
Date - problem closed :
Date - last modified :
| 10.12.2010
17.01.2012
17.01.2012 |
| Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) |
9.7.FP5
|
| Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) |
| 9.7.0.5
|
 |
