home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC74239 Status: Closed

TWO DROP TABLE STATEMENTS ON TWO DIFFERENT TABLES MAY RUN INTO A DEADLOCK

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problem description:
Running two DROP TABLE statements concurrently on two different 
tables, but with similar naming, may hit a deadlock among system 
catalog tables. 
 
User can find these associated locks and tables involved in the 
deadlock from the deadlock event monitor outputs: 
 
Application 1 performing DROP TABLE ABCD_02. 
 
  Lock Name       : 0x0000010C00000000000C000B52 
  Lock Attributes : 0x00000010 
  Release Flags   : 0x40000000 
  Table of lock waited on      : SYSDEPENDENCIES 
  Type of lock: Row 
  Mode of lock: U   - Update 
  Mode application requested on lock: U   - Update 
 
      Database partition          : 0 
      Lock Name                   : 0x0000000900000000003A000552 
      Lock Attributes             : 0x00000030 
      Release Flags               : 0x40000000 
      Lock Count                  : 1 
      Hold Count                  : 0 
      Lock Object Name            : 3801093 
      Object Type                 : Row 
      Tablespace Name             : SYSCATSPACE 
      Table Schema                : SYSIBM 
      Table Name                  : SYSINDEXCOLUSE 
      Data partition id           : 0 
      Mode                        : X   - Exclusive 
 
Application 2 performing DROP TABLE ABCD_01 
 
  Lock Name       : 0x0000000900000000003A000552 
  Lock Attributes : 0x00000010 
  Release Flags   : 0x40000000 
  Table of lock waited on      : SYSINDEXCOLUSE 
  Type of lock: Row 
  Mode of lock: X   - Exclusive 
  Mode application requested on lock: U   - Update 
 
      Database partition          : 0 
      Lock Name                   : 0x0000010C00000000000C000B52 
      Lock Attributes             : 0x00000010 
      Release Flags               : 0x40000000 
      Lock Count                  : 1 
      Hold Count                  : 0 
      Lock Object Name            : 786443 
      Object Type                 : Row 
      Tablespace Name             : SYSCATSPACE 
      Table Schema                : SYSIBM 
      Table Name                  : SYSDEPENDENCIES 
      Data partition id           : 0 
      Mode                        : U   - Update
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* DB2 UDB Version 9.7                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error description field for more information.            * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to Version 9.7 FixPack 5.                            * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Run the DROP TABLE statements sequentially or only perform 
concurrent DROP on two tables with very different naming.
available fix packs:
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Solution
Problem was first fixed in DB2 UDB Version 9.7 FixPack 5.
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
BUG-Tracking
forerunner  : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC80020 
follow-up : 
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
01.02.2011
16.12.2011
16.12.2011
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
9.7.FP5
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.7.0.5 FixList