home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC74505 Status: Closed

DB2 CAN TRAP WHEN COMPILING A SPECIFIC TYPE OF SELECT STATEMENT

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 950 - DB2
Problem description:
DB2 can trap when compiling a select statement if the optimized 
select statement satisfies all of the conditions below 
 
 
1. Either the select statement has a group-by-clause, or the 
select-clause contains the "distinct" keyword. 
 
2. The from-clause has a common table expression or a nested 
table expression. 
 
3. The where-clause of the table expression has an equity 
predicate such as column1 = <constant>. 
 
4. The where-clause of the select statement has a predicate such 
as column1 = column2, in which column1 comes from the table 
expression, and column2 is part of a unique key of other tables 
referenced in the from-clause. And column2 is not included in 
the select-clause, but column1 is included. 
 
 
 
 
An example of such a query is given below. Assume that 
T4(D1, D2, D4) is a unique key on table T4. 
 
 
SELECT DISTINCT T4.D1, T4.D3, T4.D4, T3.C3, T3.C4 
FROM 
    (SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY T2.B2, T2.B3) as C1, 
            T2.B1 as C2, T2.B2 as C3,T2.B3 as C4 
     FROM 
         (SELECT T1.A1 as B1, T1.A2 as B2, T1.A3 as B3 
          FROM T1 
          WHERE (201101 = T1.A2) 
         ) AS T2 
    ) AS T3, 
    T4 
WHERE (T3.C1 <= 30) AND (1 <= T3.C1) AND (T4.D4 = T3.C2) AND 
      (T3.C4 = T4.D1) AND (T3.C3 = T4.D2) 
 
You can find the optimized select statement in db2exfmt output. 
 
 
The corresponding call stack can look like this: 
 
in <sqlno_kc_construct_kc_key> <sqlno_key_card.C:3502> 
in <sqlno_kc_key_card> <sqlno_key_card.C:7310> 
in <sqlno_kc_all_key_card> <sqlno_key_card.C:991> 
in <sqlno_prop_mate> <sqlno_prop_misc.C:2324> 
in <MATE> <sqlno_crule_pop.C:398> 
in <sqlno_crule_simple_mate> <sqlno_crule.C:11373> 
in <sqlno_crule_mate_root> <sqlno_crule.C:11129> 
in <sqlno_crule_mate> <sqlno_crule_main.C:1823>
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* ALL                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error description field for more information.            * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to Version 9.5 FixPack 8.                            * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Add an equity predicate to the select statement. 
 
Given the above example, you can add predicate T4.D2 = 201101 to 
the select statement, and the select statement becomes 
 
 
SELECT DISTINCT T4.D1, T4.D3, T4.D4, T3.C4, T3.C3 
FROM 
    (SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY T2.B2, T2.B3) as C1, 
            T2.B1 as C2, T2.B2 as C3,T2.B3 as C4 
     FROM 
         (SELECT T1.A1 as B1, T1.A2 as B2, T1.A3 as B3 
          FROM T1 
          WHERE (201101 = T1.A2) 
         ) AS T2 
    ) AS T3, 
    T4 
WHERE (T3.C1 <= 30) AND (1 <= T3.C1) AND (T4.D4 = T3.C2) AND 
      (T3.C4 = T4.D1) AND (T3.C3 = T4.D2) and (T4.D2 = 201101)
available fix packs:
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Solution
Problem was first fixed in DB2 UDB Version 9.5 FixPack 8.
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
BUG-Tracking
forerunner  : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC74783 IC75200 
follow-up : 
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
16.02.2011
11.07.2011
11.07.2011
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
9.5.FP8
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.5.0.8 FixList