DB2 - Problem description
Problem IC78343 | Status: Closed |
QUERY WITH CORRELATION PREDICATE AND IN/EXISTS PREDICATE MAY RETURN INCORRECT RESULT WHILE IT IS MATCHING TO MQT | |
product: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 | |
Problem description: | |
A query may return incorrect result if all the following conditions are satisfied: 1. Query has a SELECT subquery "SELECT <scalar_subquery> FROM <base_table_t>" 2. <scalar_subquery> has a correlation predicate 3. <scalar_subquery> also has an IN subquery predicate, or an EXISTS predicate. That predicate can be an OR predicate subterm. 4. There exists an MQT <mqt_over_base_table_t> whose definition is "select <select_output_list> from <base_table_t> where <predicate>". For example, -- Base table create table t1(a int, b int, c int); create table t2(x int); -- MQT create table mqt1 as (select * from t1) data initially deferred refresh deferred; refresh table mqt1; -- Query SELECT (SELECT 1 FROM t1 AA WHERE AA.a = A.a AND (AA.b = 1 OR AA.c IN (SELECT x FROM t2))) FROM t1 A; the mapping of condition variables is: <scalar_subquery> = "(SELECT 1 FROM t1 AA WHERE AA.a = A.a AND (AA.b = 1 OR AA.c IN (SELECT x FROM t2)))" correlation predicate = "AA.a = A.a" IN subquery predicate = "AA.c IN (SELECT x FROM t2))" <base_table_t> = "t1" <mqt_over_base_table_t> = "mqt1" To verify if the problem is hit, generate db2exfmt plan file for the query. In that file, go to"Optimized Statement" section, and locate "= ANY (SELECT DISTINCT ". Check how many columns does "SELECT DISTINCT" include. If it has three columns, that is good and nothing else needs to be done. Otherwise, if it includes only one column, the problem might be hit. Now change query optimization level to 0 by issuing "db2 set current query optimization 0", and regenerate the db2exfmt plan against the same query, and check if "SELECT DISTINCT" contains three columns this time. If it does, then this problem is hit. | |
Problem Summary: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * ALL * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * QUERY WITH CORRELATION PREDICATE AND IN/EXISTS PREDICATE MAY * * RETURN INCORRECT RESULT WHILE IT IS MATCHING TO MQT * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to DB2 LUW Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 * **************************************************************** | |
Local Fix: | |
MQT matching should be blocked for that query. It can be done by any of following change. (1) db2 drop table <mqt_over_base_table_t>. (2) db2 set integrity for <mqt_over_base_table_t> off. (3) reduce optimization level to 0 or 1. (4) Append "WITH Rs" or "WITH RR" to query statement, assuming MQT is created at default isolation level CS. | |
available fix packs: | |
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Solution | |
Problem was first fixed in Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 | |
Workaround | |
not known / see Local fix | |
BUG-Tracking | |
forerunner : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC78345 follow-up : | |
Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 26.08.2011 15.12.2011 15.12.2011 |
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.7.FP5 | |
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) | |
9.7.0.5 |