DB2 - Problem description
Problem IC79337 | Status: Closed |
DEACTIVATION WITH LARGE BUFFERPOOL MEMORY TAKES EXCESSIVELY LONG ON LARGE WINDOWS SYSTEM | |
product: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 | |
Problem description: | |
Deactivating a database with large bufferpool memory on Windows takes excessively long. For example, it takes 10+ minutes to deactivate a database with 100GB of bufferpool memory. A workaround is to increase the units of memory allocation used for bufferpools from the default 128K to the maximum of 256MB: db2set DB2_ALLOCATION_SIZE=256M This requires stopping/starting the instance to take effect. This setting is an appropriate workaround for the size of systems vulnerable to this problem. While DB2_ALLOCATION_SIZE is a deprecated registry variable, it is still effective in DB2 Version 9.7. Note that bufferpools will only use the amount of memory that is required, i.e. the full 256MB will not be used when only a portion of that amount is needed. The same symptom could be seen for any activity (eg. last connection out) which is driving database deactivation. | |
Problem Summary: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * Large DB2/Windows systems * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * See Error Description * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 * **************************************************************** | |
Local Fix: | |
db2set DB2_ALLOCATION_SIZE=256M ( requires stopping/starting the instance ) | |
available fix packs: | |
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Solution | |
Problem first fixed in DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 | |
Workaround | |
not known / see Local fix | |
BUG-Tracking | |
forerunner : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC84260 follow-up : | |
Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 20.10.2011 21.06.2012 21.06.2012 |
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.7.FP6 | |
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) | |
9.7.0.6 |