|
Problem IC79572
|
Status: Closed |
DB2TCP_CLIENT_RCVTIMEOUT IS SET TO 0 IF YOU ISSUE CONNECT STATEM ENT FOR MULTIPLE TIMES WITHOUT DISCONNECT OR CONNECT RESET. |
| product: |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 |
| Problem description: |
If you issued CONNECT statement multiple times without any
DISCONNECT or CONNECT RESET between them, DB2's registry
variable DB2TCP_CLIENT_RCVTIMEOUT would be set to 0 ever since
the 2nd time of CONNECT statement.
This problem only happens when both DB2TCP_CLIENT_RCVTIMEOUT and
DB2TCP_CLIENT_CONTIMEOUT are enabled. |
| Problem Summary: |
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED: *
* All users of version 9.7 on Linux, Unix and Windows *
* platforms. *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: *
* See Error Description *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION: *
* Upgrade to DB2 UDB Version 9.7 FixPak 6 or higher levels. *
**************************************************************** |
| Local Fix: |
1. Starting from the 2nd CONNECT statement, issue DISCONNECT or
CONNECT RESET statement prior to CONNECT statement.
2. Use DB2TCP_CLIENT_RCVTIMEOUT only, do not use registry
variable DB2TCP_CLIENT_CONTIMEOUT. |
| available fix packs: |
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
|
| Solution |
First fixed in DB2 UDB Version 9.7 FixPak 6. |
| Workaround |
1. Starting from the 2nd CONNECT statement, issue DISCONNECT or
CONNECT RESET statement prior to CONNECT statement.
2. Use DB2TCP_CLIENT_RCVTIMEOUT only, do not use registry
variable DB2TCP_CLIENT_CONTIMEOUT. |
| Timestamps |
Date - problem reported :
Date - problem closed :
Date - last modified :
| 01.11.2011
12.06.2012
12.06.2012 |
| Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) |
9.7.
|
| Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) |
| 9.7.0.6
|
 |
