DB2 - Problem description
Problem IC81291 | Status: Closed |
PAUSING INPLACE TABLE REORG RETURNS SQL2219N RC=11, BUT OLR SHOWS AS IN PROGRESS | |
product: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 950 - DB2 | |
Problem description: | |
When issuing a pause on an inplace table reorg that has nearly finished reorganizing the table, DB2 may incorrectly return SQL2219N Reason Code 11: "There is no table reorganization to PAUSE or STOP". However, monitoring utilities may still show that the reorganization is still in progress. This contradiction occurs during a timing window where the reorganization has completed processing all rows but has not yet committed because it is waiting for existing readers and writers on the table to complete. | |
Problem Summary: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * All * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * An SQL2219N RC=11 error may be returned stating that there * * is no reorg on the table even though monitoring shows that * * there is a reorg on the table. This reorg has finished * * moving rows, but has not yet fully committed. * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to the latest fix pack. * **************************************************************** | |
Local Fix: | |
The reorg on the table has completed processing and is waiting for existing readers and writers to complete. The SQL2219N RC=11 error message may be safely ignored. The reorg will commit and disappear from monitoring when all existing readers and writers complete. | |
Solution | |
This problem was first fixed in DB2 V9.5 Fix Pack 10. Instead of returning SQL2219N RC=11 in this scenario, DB2 will now return SQL2219N RC=10, which is a more accurate reflection of the correct status of the inplace reorg. | |
Workaround | |
not known / see Local fix | |
Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 08.02.2012 04.09.2012 04.09.2012 |
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.5.FP10 | |
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) | |
9.5.0.10 |