DB2 - Problem description
Problem IC81299 | Status: Closed |
FAILED REORG INDEXES WITH ALLOW NO ACCESS CAN LEAD TO TABLE-INDEX MISMATCH | |
product: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 950 - DB2 | |
Problem description: | |
There is problem in the REORG INDEXES error handling code that could result in a mismatch between the table and index if REORG INDEXES fails in a small window due to limited resources at the beginning of its processing. To hit this problem you need to be on DB2 9.5 FixPack 5 to 8, run REORG INDEXES with the ALLOW NO ACCESS option, without the CLEANUP ONLY option and you need to have it fail when allocating memory for the REORG INDEXES progress monitor. You will see db2diag.log messages similar to the following: 2012-02-08-11.23.43.398565-300 I32056E526 LEVEL: Warning PID : 9121 TID : 46912979855680PROC : db2sysc INSTANCE: ztoth NODE : 000 DB : WSDB APPHDL : 0-15 APPID: *LOCAL.ztoth.120208162340 AUTHID : ZTOTH EDUID : 25 EDUNAME: db2agent (WSDB) FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, relation data serv, sqlrreorg_indexes, probe:300 DATA #1 : String, 96 bytes Starting Offline Reorg Indexes on: Table T1 (poolID 2 : objectID 4) with reorg flags 0x04000010 2012-02-08-11.23.43.400329-300 E32583E532 LEVEL: Warning PID : 9121 TID : 46912979855680PROC : db2sysc INSTANCE: ztoth NODE : 000 DB : WSDB APPHDL : 0-15 APPID: *LOCAL.ztoth.120208162340 AUTHID : ZTOTH EDUID : 25 EDUNAME: db2agent (WSDB) FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, relation data serv, sqlrreorg_indexes, probe:400 MESSAGE : ADM9501W BEGIN index reorganization on table "ZTOTH .T1" (ID "4") and table space "USERSPACE1" (ID "2"). 2012-02-08-11.30.30.006153-300 I35204E500 LEVEL: Severe PID : 9121 TID : 46912979855680PROC : db2sysc INSTANCE: ztoth NODE : 000 DB : WSDB APPHDL : 0-15 APPID: *LOCAL.ztoth.120208162340 AUTHID : ZTOTH EDUID : 25 EDUNAME: db2agent (WSDB) FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, relation data serv, sqlrreorg_index_obj, probe:800 DATA #2 : Hexdump, 4 bytes 0x00002AAAC77F0560 : 0200 0F8B .... 2012-02-08-11.30.30.008525-300 E35705E690 LEVEL: Warning PID : 9121 TID : 46912979855680PROC : db2sysc INSTANCE: ztoth NODE : 000 DB : WSDB APPHDL : 0-15 APPID: *LOCAL.ztoth.120208162340 AUTHID : ZTOTH EDUID : 25 EDUNAME: db2agent (WSDB) FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, relation data serv, sqlrreorg_indexes, probe:1000 MESSAGE : ADM9504W Index reorganization on table "ZTOTH .T1" (ID "4") and table space "USERSPACE1" (ID "2") failed on this node with SQLCODE "-956" reason code "". To resolve this problem, re-submit the REORG INDEXES command on the failing node(s). Please note that these probe points can be reported even if we failed outside of the problematic timing window. If the problem is hit, then at this point the index object descriptor will indicate an error while page zero of the index object will not. As a result, the index is not maintained on undo, and the index can become out-of-sync with the table. This could result in a number of different symptoms. The following are two examples: 1) Row not found in table during data fetch from index. A message with the following text may appear in the db2diag.log: FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data management, sqldDataFetch, probe:4623 MESSAGE : Row not found on data fetch from index! 2) Row not found in the index during the update or delete of a row in the table. A message with the following text may appear in the db2diag.log: FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, index manager, procT2Leaf2Del, probe:7 RETCODE : ZRC=0x8709002C=-2029453268=SQLI_NOKEY "Key not found within node" DIA8541C The index key could not be found, the value was "". | |
Problem Summary: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * All uers * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * See the Error Description field. * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to DB2 version 9.5.0.9. * **************************************************************** | |
Local Fix: | |
Recreate the affected indexes. | |
available fix packs: | |
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
Solution | |
The problem is first fixed in DB2 version 9.5.0.9. | |
Workaround | |
not known / see Local fix | |
Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 08.02.2012 19.03.2012 19.03.2012 |
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.5.0.9 | |
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) | |
9.5.0.9 |