|
Problem IC82717
|
Status: Closed |
CORRELATION TO OUTER JOIN OPERATOR (+) MAY RETURN SQL0206N |
| product: |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 |
| Problem description: |
A correlation in the TABLE (or LATERAL) keyword of a FROM clause
of a subselect
when using in an outer join operator (+) may return SQL0206N.
This problem occurs
when the correlated column is from the table whose column is
used with the (+)
in the WHERE clause.
For example:
SELECT *
FROM T1, T2, TABLE ( F1(T2.C1) ) AS TX
WHERE T1.C1 = T2.C1 (+) |
| Problem Summary: |
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED: *
* DB2 FOR LUW ALL EDITIONS *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: *
* A correlation in the TABLE (or LATERAL) keyword of a FROM *
* clause of a subselect *
* when using in an outer join operator (+) may return *
* SQL0206N. This problem occurs *
* when the correlated column is from the table whose column is *
* used with the (+) *
* in the WHERE clause. *
* *
* For example: *
* *
* SELECT * *
* FROM T1, T2, TABLE ( F1(T2.C1) ) AS TX *
* WHERE T1.C1 = T2.C1 (+) *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION: *
* Use equivalent ANSI outer join syntax instead of the (+) *
* syntax. *
**************************************************************** |
| Local Fix: |
Use equivalent ANSI outer join syntax instead of the (+) syntax |
| available fix packs: |
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
|
| Solution |
|
| Workaround |
Use equivalent ANSI outer join syntax instead of the (+) syntax |
| BUG-Tracking |
forerunner : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC87890
follow-up : |
| Timestamps |
Date - problem reported :
Date - problem closed :
Date - last modified :
| 18.04.2012
07.01.2013
07.01.2013 |
| Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) |
|
| Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) |
| 9.7.0.7
|
 |
