home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC84216 Status: Closed

LIKE CLAUSES MIGHT RETURN INCORRECT RESULTS FOR COLUMNS WITH VARCHAR DATA
TYPE IN UNICODE DATABASES

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A10 - DB2
Problem description:
In Unicode databases when clients with double-byte codepage are 
used, LIKE clauses might return incorrect results for columns 
defined as varchar data type. 
 
For example, you create a table t1 and then issue INSERT 
statements with values similar to the following statements: 
 
db2 "create table t1 (NAME varchar(10))" 
db2 "insert into t1 values ('a_abc')" 
db2 "insert into t1 values ('a_bc')" 
db2 "insert into t1 values ('a__c')" 
db2 "insert into t1 values ('a2bc')" 
db2 "insert into t1 values ('aabc')" 
db2 "insert into t1 values ('abc')" 
 
Then you run the following queries: 
db2 "select * from t1 where NAME LIKE '%a__'"    <<-- SQL #1 
db2 "select * from t1 where NAME LIKE '%a__a%'"  <<-- SQL #2 
db2 "select * from t1 where NAME LIKE '%a__b%'"  <<-- SQL #3 
 
The number of rows that you receive from the above queries is: 5 
:  1 :  1, which is incorrect. The correct number of rows is: 6 
:  1 :  4 and is returned by the above queries when the column 
NAME is defined as char data type. 
 
Note: In the above statements and queries, '__' represents one 
double-byte underscore character and '_' represents one 
single-byte underscore character.
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* DB2 UDB Version 10.1                                         * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to Version 10.1 FixPack 1.                           * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
available fix packs:
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 1 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 3a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Solution
Problem was first fixed in DB2 UDB Version 10.1 FixPack 1.
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
13.06.2012
13.11.2012
13.11.2012
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
10.1.0.1 FixList
10.5.0.1 FixList