home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC84684 Status: Closed

JDBC WRAPPER MAY RETURN SQL1822N WHEN A CONSTRAINT VIOLATION OCCURS.

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A10 - DB2
Problem description:
JDBC wrapper can't be able to map constraint violation errors to 
DB2 errors. Users may receive SQL1822N other than detailed DB2 
error when a constraint violation occurs. 
 
For example: 
SELECT * FROM a_jdbc_nickname 
 
c1     c2 
------ ----------- 
     1           1 
     2           2 
 
  2 record(s) selected. 
 
INSERT INTO a_jdbc_nickname values(3, 2) 
DB21034E  The command was processed as an SQL statement because 
it was not a valid Command Line Processor command.  During SQL 
processing it returned: 
SQL1822N  Unexpected error code "23505" received from data 
source "<your_jdbc_server>". Associated text and tokens are 
"ERROR:duplicate key value violates unique cons". 
SQLSTATE=560BD
Problem Summary:
User affected: 
  Users of JDBC wrappers in InfoSphere Federation Server 
Problem description and summay: 
  See error description
Local Fix:
available fix packs:
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 1 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 3a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Solution
Problem was fistly fixed in Version 10, FixPak 1. This 
fix should be applied on the federation Server.
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
19.06.2012
01.11.2012
01.11.2012
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
10.1.0.1 FixList
10.5.0.1 FixList