home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC84690 Status: Closed

QUERY WITH A UNION AND TWO CORRELATED BRANCHES MIGHT RETURN INCORRECT
RESULTS IN PARTITIONED DATABASE ENVIRONMENTS

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 950 - DB2
Problem description:
If you are using the partitioned database environment and 
your query satisfies the following conditions, then the results 
returned might be incorrect 
1. there is a table, T1, that is hash distributed across two or 
more database partitions; 
2. T1 is correlated to multiple branches below a UNION; 
3. each branch of the UNION is correlated to at least one 
different column in T1; 
4. one of the branches is correlated to the hash distribution 
key of T1; 
5. the columns in the select list of each UNION branch includes 
the correlation column. 
 
The following is an example of a query that satisfies the above 
conditions, where T1 is hash distributed on column X: 
 
SELECT * 
  FROM T1, 
       TABLE(SELECT X FROM T2 WHERE X = T1.X 
             UNION ALL 
             SELECT Y FROM T3 WHERE Y = T1.Y);
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* All users of database partitioning feature.                  * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 version 9.5 Fix Pack 10                       * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
You can avoid the problem by rewriting the query to remove the 
correlation below the UNION.
Solution
Problem was first fixed in Version 9.5 Fix Pack 10
Workaround
See Local Fix
BUG-Tracking
forerunner  : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC85422 IC85425 
follow-up : 
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
18.06.2012
21.08.2012
07.12.2012
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
9.5.FP10
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.5.0.10 FixList