home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC97244 Status: Closed

THE CONNECTION ISOLATION LEVEL IS NOT PRESERVED AFTER A TRANSACTION BUT
RE-SET TO THE PRODUCT DEFAULT.

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problem description:
You have a .NET application that, in the connection string 
specifies the isolation level wanted for a connection like in: 
 
     IsolationLevel=RepeatableRead; 
 
If an explicit transaction is started, with its own TX level 
isolation, once completed, the connection isolation level is not 
put back to the level specified in the connection string 
(RepeatableRead, in the example) but instead it becomes 
CommittedRead. which would be default if no isolation level was 
specified in the connection string.
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* ALL                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10.                      * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Solution
First fixed in DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10.
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
BUG-Tracking
forerunner  : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC97248 IC97249 
follow-up : 
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
28.10.2013
11.11.2014
11.11.2014
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
9.7.FP10
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.7.0.10 FixList