home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC97248 Status: Closed

THE CONNECTION ISOLATION LEVEL IS NOT PRESERVED AFTER A TRANSACTION BUT
RE-SET TO THE PRODUCT DEFAULT.

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A10 - DB2
Problem description:
You have a .NET application that, in the connection string 
specifies the isolation level wanted for a connection like in: 
 
     IsolationLevel=RepeatableRead; 
 
If an explicit transaction is started, with its own TX level 
isolation, once completed, the connection isolation level is not 
put back to the level specified in the connection string 
(RepeatableRead, in the example) but instead it becomes 
CommittedRead. which would be default if no isolation level was 
specified in the connection string.
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* ALL                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 4.                      * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
available fix packs:
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Solution
First fixed in DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 4.
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
28.10.2013
05.06.2014
05.06.2014
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
10.1.0.4 FixList