home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC98789 Status: Closed

HASH LATCH CONTENTION CAUSES POOR PERFORMANCE

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problem description:
This APAR applies to all platforms under the combination of the 
following conditions: 
1) A LOCKLIST greater than 8000 pages is used. 
2) Many applications are accessing one specific table 
concurrently via SELECT or DELETE queries, or via searched 
DELETE or CLOSE CURSOR operations against cursor opened FOR READ 
ONLY. 
 
If you suspect that you are hitting this problem, collect "db2pd 
-latches" at various intervals.  The output that is relevant in 
this case is column 2 (Holder), column 3 (Waiter) and column 5 
(LatchType).  If you see many lines of output that have a 
LatchType of SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch (lock manager hash 
table latch) and have the same Holder value (EDU ID of the EDU 
holding the latch) with various Waiter values (EDU ID of an EDU 
waiting on the latch), then it is possible that you might be 
hitting this issue.  Note that multiple unique holders may be 
present, as is the case in this example. 
Address            Holder     Waiter     Filename 
LOC        LatchType            HoldCount 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     213934     sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     129857     sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     140132     sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
... repeats many times ... 
... with the same Holder value ... 
... with varying Waiter values ... 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     1186579    sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     1190691    sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     1200514    sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     1202054    sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     800313     sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 798762     467072     sqlpLockInternal.h 554 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 0 
... skip some other entries ... 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 1156509    213934     sqlpLockInternal.h 520 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 1 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 1156509    129857     sqlpLockInternal.h 520 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 1 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 1156509    140132     sqlpLockInternal.h 520 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 1 
... repeats many times ... 
... with the same Holder value (but different than the Holder 
value above) ... 
... with varying Waiter values ... 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 1156509    148094     sqlpLockInternal.h 520 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 1 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 1156509    149379     sqlpLockInternal.h 520 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 1 
0x07000046EBBE0B58 1156509    160167     sqlpLockInternal.h 520 
SQLO_LT_SQLP_LHSH__hshlatch 1 
... skip other entries ... 
Once you have confirmed from "db2pd -latches" output that your 
environment might be suffering from this issue, you can collect 
additional information from agents to confirm that this specific 
problem is the issue in your environment. 
For each of the holder values in the "db2pd -latches" output, 
collect "db2pd -stacks <holder_EDU_ID>" to dump the stack trace 
of the EDUs waiting on the hash latch.  This may need to be 
collected mutiple times in order to capture an instance when the 
EDU is actively holding the latch. 
The holder EDU stack that indicates the problem scenario looks 
like this: 
-------Frame------ ------Function + Offset------ 
0x09000000000FF858 thread_wait + 0x98 
0x0900000045849C34 getConflictComplex__17SQLO_SLATCH_CAS64FCUl + 
0x3D4 
0x090000004584A258 getConflict__17SQLO_SLATCH_CAS64FCUl + 0xD8 
0x0900000045EEA990 sqlplrl__FP9sqeBsuEduP14SQLP_LOCK_INFO + 
0x3F0 
0x090000004685F3A0 sqldmclo__FP8sqeAgentPP8SQLD_CCBi + 0x1BA0 
0x09000000468545F0 sqlriclo__FP8sqlrr_cbP9sqlri_taoi + 0x550 
0x0900000045B9BA98 sqlricjp__FP8sqlrr_cbP12sqlri_opparmilT4 + 
0x2B8 
0x0900000045B9B4C8 sqlricls_simple__FP8sqlrr_cbil + 0x1488 
0x09000000476F15AC sqlrr_process_close_request__FP8sqlrr_cbiN32 
+ 0x20C 
0x0900000046EFEEE8 
sqlrr_close__FP14db2UCinterfaceP15db2UCCursorInfo + 0x208 
 
In addition, for various waiter values in the "db2pd -latches" 
output, collect "db2pd -stacks <waiter_EDU_ID>".  Again, you may 
need to collect this multiple times in order to capture an 
instance when the EDU is actively waiting on the latch. 
The waiter EDU stack that indicates the problem scenario looks 
like this: 
-------Frame------ ------Function + Offset------ 
0x09000000000F7A94 thread_wait + 0x94 
0x0900000037F7314C getConflictComplex__17SQLO_SLATCH_CAS64FCUl + 
0x318 
0x0900000037F7392C getConflict__17SQLO_SLATCH_CAS64FCUl + 0x68 
0x0900000037F255A4 
getConflict__17SQLO_SLATCH_CAS64FCUl@glueFB@clone1 + 0x74 
0x0900000037F254CC 
sqlpLatchHashEntryForTableLockExclusive__FP9SQLP_LHSH@glue13EF + 
0x20 
0x0900000037F927BC sqlplrq__FP9sqeBsuEduP14SQLP_LOCK_INFO + 
0x104 
0x0900000037FCBFC8 
sqldLockTable__FP8sqeAgentP14SQLP_LOCK_INFOUiUsi + 0xF8 
0x0900000037FCC650 
sqldScanOpen__FP8sqeAgentP14SQLD_SCANINFO1P14SQLD_SCANINFO2PPv + 
0x57C 
0x0900000037FCB8BC sqlriopn__FP8sqlrr_cbP9sqlri_taoPi + 0x29C 
0x0900000037FCB564 sqlriopn__FP8sqlrr_cbP9sqlri_taoPi@glue271 + 
0x74 
0x0900000037FA1D1C sqlrita__FP8sqlrr_cb + 0x6C 
0x0900000037F9FEA4 sqlriSectInvoke__FP8sqlrr_cbP12sqlri_opparm + 
0x24 
0x0900000038015A2C 
sqlrr_process_fetch_request__FP14db2UCinterface + 0x1E4 
0x0900000037FF02E0 
sqlrr_open__FP14db2UCinterfaceP15db2UCCursorInfo + 0xB0C 
 
If the three primary conditions are met, and holder EDU and 
waiter EDU stacks match those listed above, then you might 
obtain relief after applying the local fix or by upgrading to a 
newer level of DB2 that contains the fix for this APAR. 
Local Fix 
Apply the following registry setting and restart DB2. 
DB2_KEEPTABLELOCK=TRANSACTION
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* All users                                                    * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 V97FP10 or higher version.                    * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
DB2_KEEPTABLELOCK=TRANSACTION
Solution
Fixed on DB2 V97FP10 or higher version.
Workaround
DB2_KEEPTABLELOCK=TRANSACTION
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
17.01.2014
18.11.2014
18.11.2014
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
9.7.FP10
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.7.0.10 FixList