home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IT01794 Status: Closed

QUERIES CONTAINING COMPLEX OR PREDICATE WITH THE SAME COLUMN REFERENCED IN
MULTIPLE SUBTERMS MAY EXPERIENCE POOR PERFORMANCE

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A50 - DB2
Problem description:
Queries that contain complex OR predicates may experience poor 
cardinality estimation and a poorly performing access plan may 
be generated. The OR predicate must 
- reference multiple columns 
- each subterm of the OR contains references to some of the same 
columns 
- for a given column the predicate in each OR subterm is 
different 
 
For example 
 
  ((ca_country = 'United States' and 
    ca_state in ('KY', 'GA', 'NM') and 
    ss_net_profit between 100 and 200) 
 or 
   (ca_country = 'United States' and 
    ca_state in ('MT', 'OR', 'MT') and 
    ss_net_profit between 150 and 300) 
 or 
   (ca_country = 'United States' and 
    ca_state in ('IN', 'WI', 'MO') and 
    ss_net_profit between 50 and 250)) 
 
Each subterm of the OR predicate contains a reference to 
ca_country, ca_state and ss_net_profit. For the columns ca_state 
and ss_net_profit, the actual predicate referencing these 
columns is different in each branch. 
 
Such an OR predicate may be susceptible to incorrect filter 
factor estimation, 
using the db2exfmt output you may see predicates with the 
SELECTIVITY 1.0 attribute. 
 
(Q5.SS_SALES_PRICE >= +50.00 SELECTIVITY 1.000000) AND 
(Q5.SS_SALES_PRICE <= +300.00 SELECTIVITY 1.000000) 
 
Using some test queries you should validate whether the 
cardinality 
of lower operators in the plan is accurate.
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* ALL                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 LUW version 10.5 fixpak 4.                    * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
available fix packs:
DB2 Cancun Release 10.5.0.4 (also known as Fix Pack 4) for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.5 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Solution
First fixed in DB2 LUW version 10.5 fixpak 4.
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
14.05.2014
08.09.2014
08.09.2014
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
10.5.0.4 FixList