home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IT02174 Status: Closed

Query may throw Runtime Error such as overflow, divide by 0, or casting
error due to JOIN PREDICATE EXPRESSION

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problem description:
This is impacting version 9.7 FP9 only. 
 
Join predicate expression may throw run time error such as 
overflow, divide by 0, or casting error. This behavior is as 
designed and complies with SQL standard. The purpose of this 
APAR is to reduce the risks of hitting this kind of problem. 
 
In version 9.7 FP9, the DB2 query rewrite is able to push down 
expression equality join predicate, called jPrd, to sub query in 
order for the optimizer to plan MSJOIN and HSJOIN; otherwise 
only NLJOIN would be considered for jPrd. Such expression, 
called JExp, push down is restricted to columns output from 
GROUP BY, UNION, and UNION ALL sub query. When there is local 
predicate, called lPrd, applied on top of the same sub query, 
lPrd used to be not pushed down into the sub query. The 
predicate evaluation order is free for DB2 optimizer to 
determine from the access plan costing perspective. For example, 
the desirable predicate order forms better index start-stop key 
if index scan is available. This doesn't necessarily take 
expression run time error into consideration. Either jPrd or 
lPrd may have expression whose computation over the entire sub 
query may get run time error, such as overflow, divide by 0, or 
casting error, whereas applying one before another may avoid the 
run time error. DB2 compiler doesn't have to worry about the run 
time error when it determines the predicate order. But if lPrd 
is simple comparison predicate, it has no expression so it won't 
cause any run time error, and pushing it down to the sub query 
can reduce the chance of run time error from computing jExp.
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* ALL                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Please upgrade to V9.7 FP10                                  * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Solution
First fixed in V9.7 FP10
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
03.06.2014
10.11.2014
10.11.2014
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
9.7.FP10
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.7.0.10 FixList