home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IT04356 Status: Closed

LOW PERFORMANCE OF QUERIES ON ADMSINTABINFO

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A10 - DB2
Problem description:
Queries on ADMSINTABINFO are slow even if all TCBs are loaded in 
memory already. 
 
I set DBHEAP to 40000, should be able to store 20000 tables' TCB 
info, actually about 10000 tables in that db. 
Check with "db2pd -db testdb -tcb" to make sure all tables TCB 
was in DBHEAP. 
 
time db2 "select tabname from sysibmadm.admintabinfo where 
reorg_pending='Y'" 
 
TABNAME 
---------------------------------------------------------------- 
---------------------------------------------------------------- 
ADMIN99 
ADMIN999 
 
  2 record(s) selected. 
 
real    2m48.74s 
user    0m0.01s 
sys     0m0.01s 
 
I still saw bufferpool data read as below 
 
Buffer pool data logical reads             = 337188 
Buffer pool data physical reads            = 323543
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* ALL                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 V10.1fp5.                                     * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Solution
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
12.09.2014
15.07.2015
15.07.2015
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
10.1.0.5 FixList