home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IT04408 Status: Closed

SQLSTATISTICS ROUTINE, CLI/ODBC SQLSTATISTICS CALL, JDBC GETINDE XINFO CALL
RETURN SQLCODE -413 FOR LARGE VALUES OF CARDINALITY

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problem description:
Currently, the SYSIBM.SQLSTATISTICS routine and the 
corresponding CLI/ODBC SQLStatistics () andd JDBC getIndexInfo 
calls, return SQLCODE -413 (Overflow occurred during numeric 
data type conversion) if the CARDINALITY returned exceeds 
2147483647. 
 
Per the ODBC specification,  we return CARDINALITY as INTEGER. 
However it is defined as BIGINT in the referenced table 
SYSIBM.SQLSTATISTICS. So, the SQLSTATISTICS routine CASTSs 
CARDINALITY to INTEGER before returning this value. 
 
If the CARDINALITY value returned is greater than the maximum 
allowable INTEGER value (2147483647), then a numeric overflow 
error will occur on the data type conversion (SQLCODE -413). 
 
The design will be changed to return 2147483647 (largest INTEGER 
value) when CARDINALITY cannot fit into INTEGER. 
 
This design is consistent with other IBM-defined views and 
routines which reference CARDINALITY. 
 
This is the same issue as DB2 9.7 APAR IC70444.
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* DB2 LUW users                                                * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 9.7 FP11 or later                             * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Solution
The problem is fixed in DB2 9.7 FP11
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
16.09.2014
07.10.2015
07.10.2015
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
9.7.FP11
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.7.0.11 FixList