home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IT04474 Status: Closed

"LIMIT # OFFSET #" MAY RETURN MORE ROWS THAN EXPECTED WHEN
QUERIES CONTAIN UNION OR UNION ALL OPERATORS.

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A10 - DB2
Problem description:
Queries containing UNION or UNION ALL operators with "LIMIT # 
OFFSET #" clause does not behave the same way as FETCH FIRST N 
ROWS ONLY. As such, under these conditions, it may return more 
rows than expected. 
 
Consider a query using the "FETCH FIRST 1 ROW ONLY" clause : 
> select 1 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
  union all 
   select 2 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
   ORDER BY C1 ASC 
   FETCH FIRST 1 ROWS ONLY 
 
Which returns: 
C1 
 
          1 
 
  1 record(s) selected. 
 
 
Using the same data with a "LIMIT 1 OFFSET 0" clause to mimic 
the "FETCH FIRST 1 ROWS ONLY" 
> select 1 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
   union all 
   select 2 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
   ORDER BY C1 ASC 
   LIMIT 1 OFFSET 0 
 
We get more rows than expected if this is used in conjunction 
with UNION or UNION ALL: 
 
C1 
 
          1 
          2 
 
  2 record(s) selected. 
 
> select 1 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
   union all 
   select 2 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
   ORDER BY C1 ASC 
   LIMIT 1 OFFSET 1 
 
C1 
 
          1 
          2 
 
  2 record(s) selected. 
 
 
The problem can be circumvented as follows : 
 
> select * from 
     ( select 1 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
       union all 
       select 2 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
       ORDER BY C1 ASC ) 
    LIMIT 1 OFFSET 0 
 
C1 
 
          1 
 
  1 record(s) selected.
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* all                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to version 10.1 Fix Pack 5                           * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Solution
First fixed in version 10.1 Fix Pack 5
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
18.09.2014
16.07.2015
16.07.2015
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
10.1.0.5 FixList